• Teles, S. (2013). “Kludgeocracy in America.” National Affairs, (17) , 97–114. – A sharp critique of the “ill-assorted collection of programs” in U.S. policy, arguing that governmental complexity allows insiders to hide rents and defeats public understanding. Teles writes that “policy complexity…makes it hard to see just who is benefit- ting and how; complexity so thoroughly obscures the actual mechanism of political action that it is difficult to mobilize against” . This insight perfectly encapsulates how complexity enables the quiet “theft” of accountability and aligns with warnings about hidden redistribu- tion and lack of transparency. • Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance . Oxford University Press. – An edited vol- ume analyzing the proliferation of indirect policy tools (contracts, tax expenditures, public-private partnerships, etc.) in modern gov- ernance. It shows how the shift from direct government provision to complex networks of third-party implementers can blur lines of responsibility and accountability. This “new governance” context helps in explaining the structural roots of today’s accountability challenges. 5. The Influence of Technology and Algorithmic Governance on Public Outcomes • O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy . Crown Publishing. – A seminal book that uncovers the dark side of algo- rithmic decision-making in finance, policing, education, and more. O’Neil demonstrates how opaque algorithms can entrench bias and produce harmful unintended consequences at scale, acting as new forms of “systemic opacity” in governance. This work shows how accountability can be lost when decisions disappear inside black- box models.
301
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online