W hen teams work under pressure, internal controls become easier to bypass, overlook or override. This issue is not unique to healthcare, but the scale and complexity of the NHS make it particularly vulnerable, especially when operational pressures limit the time available for proper scrutiny. While NHS fraud cases often focus on local issues, such as timesheet manipulation, procurement abuse or misuse of purchasing systems, wider trends offer useful lessons about how fraud emerges when systems are strained.
2. High workloads increase the chance of control gaps Organisational pressure, including tight deadlines, staffing challenges and increasing service demands, can create blind spots that enable fraud to develop unnoticed. In the NHS, these pressures are well‑documented in national reporting on system performance and workforce strain, which directly affects the robustness of internal processes. Under pressure, controls that normally operate well can begin to weaken. Examples include:
4. Why this matters now
The NHS Counter Fraud Authority (NHSCFA) has repeatedly highlighted the level of financial risk the NHS faces, estimating over £1.3 billion of NHS funding is vulnerable to fraud, bribery and corruption each year. In an environment where resources are already stretched, the consequences of control failures can be far‑reaching. At the same time, newer initiatives such as Project WISE (Workforce Integrity and System Efficiency) show that data‑driven approaches are increasingly being used to identify vulnerabilities and detect emerging patterns of fraud more quickly across NHS systems. These developments highlight the need for organisations to treat internal control resilience as a core part of patient‑facing service protection, not simply as an administrative function.
•
approvals being rushed through
1. Warning signs are still being missed
•
audit trails becoming incomplete
Recent sector news shows that major audit failings often stem from not reviewing core financial records in enough depth, overlooking inconsistencies that should prompt further investigation, and insufficiently challenging information provided by those being audited.
•
reliance on single individuals for key tasks
•
reduced oversight of temporary, agency or remote staff
5. What NHS organisations can do
Fraudsters often exploit these gaps, knowing that overstretched teams may not have capacity to challenge irregularities.
NHS fraud cases frequently show that:
Even in high‑pressure environments, there are practical steps organisations can take to strengthen control effectiveness:
•
paperwork was approved without review
•
Reinforce expectations around verification – encourage managers to challenge inconsistencies and avoid relying solely on trust or habit. Protect segregation of duties – ensure no single individual is responsible for end‑to‑end financial processes. Prioritise high‑risk areas – such as timesheets, payroll, procurement, asset management and system access. Support staff with targeted training – especially those responsible for authorising claims, overseeing budgets or managing system access. Review workloads – if key control points sit with staff who have little capacity, risk increases. Adjusting workloads can be a strong fraud‑prevention measure. Use data proactively – simple trend analysis, exception reporting or comparisons with expected activity can highlight early signals of fraud.
3. Fraud within NHS operational processes reflects the same themes Recent NHS fraud cases echo the wider trends seen in the corporate sector, whereby controls were present on paper but not consistently applied in practice. Cases reported in late 2025 and early 2026 include unauthorised shift changes, manipulation of rostering systems and misuse of positions of trust, enabled by weak oversight or excessive reliance on individual staff members with system access. Similarly, there have been instances where insufficient checks on identity, timesheets or financial transactions allowed misconduct to continue for extended periods before being detected. These cases demonstrate that even basic controls, such as authorisation checks, segregation of duties, and verification of records, can falter when workloads are heavy or when roles are not clearly defined.
•
managers relied on verbal assurances
•
reconciliations were skipped due to time pressure routine oversight became informal when teams were short‑staffed
•
•
This indicates that even experienced staff can overlook warning signs if the working environment encourages speed over scrutiny.
•
•
•
•
Teams should feel empowered to take the time needed to apply controls properly, even when demand is high.
COUNTER FRAUD | SCRUTTON BLAND | 11
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog