"Amazon Insurance Inc.," reported $283 million in written premiums and $2 billion in assets in 2020. British Petroleum's captive entity, "Jupiter Insurance Ltd.," made headlines by paying out a staggering $1.5 billion in claims related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010. These figures showcase the immense scale and financial impact of captive insurance for these industry giants. The numbers associated with Apple's captive insurance company, "Apple Re Ltd.," highlight the substantial financial resources dedicated to managing risks within the company. With $1.8 billion in assets, Apple has established a robust insurance entity that enables the company to assume and manage risks internally. This level of control and financial strength allows Apple to tailor insurance coverage to its unique needs and potentially generate underwriting profits. Amazon's captive insurance company, "Amazon Insurance Inc.," also showcases the staggering numbers that can be achieved through captive insurance. With $2 billion in assets and $283 million in written premiums, Amazon has created a captive insurance entity that serves as a strategic risk management tool. By assuming risks internally, Amazon can gain greater control over its insurance programs, ensure coverage alignment with its operations, and potentially save on insurance costs over time. British Petroleum's captive entity, "Jupiter Insurance Ltd.," serves as a vivid example of the financial impact of captive insurance in the face of significant risks. Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, Jupiter Insurance Ltd. paid out an immense $1.5 billion in claims. This demonstrates the critical role captive insurance plays in providing financial protection for large- scale catastrophes, ensuring that companies like British Petroleum can handle substantial losses without relying solely on external insurers. While these baffling numbers associated with Fortune 500 companies are indeed remarkable, it is important to emphasize that captive insurance is not exclusive to industry giants. Middle-market businesses have the potential to establish their own captive insurance entities on a scale that suits their size and operations. Captive insurance empowers these businesses to assume control over their risks, customize insurance coverage, and potentially access cost-effective solutions that address their specific needs. The numbers reported by captive insurance entities of Fortune-sized companies like Apple, Amazon, and British Petroleum highlight the significant financial impact and risk management capabilities associated with captive insurance. These entities demonstrate the immense scale and resources that can be devoted to managing risks internally. However, it is crucial to recognize that middle-market businesses also have the opportunity to leverage captive insurance to achieve similar benefits on a business level and scale. By embracing captive insurance, middle-market companies can take control of their risks, tailor coverage to their needs, and enhance their financial resilience in the face of unforeseen events. In addition to upfront monetary costs and risk management expertise needed for captives, another consideration is the regulatory side. Regulations play a role in the relative scarcity of captives in the middle-market. Captive insurance is subject to various regulatory requirements, and compliance can be complex and resource intensive. Fortune 1000 companies often have the resources to navigate these regulatory landscapes and fulfill the necessary reporting and compliance obligations. In contrast, middle-market companies may find it more burdensome to
31
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker