Group and association captives involve multiple businesses coming together, either through a formal association or informal relationship, to utilize a captive for obtaining coverage or limits that would otherwise be inaccessible. This arrangement has emerged as a revenue source and a means of fostering industry cohesion for various trade groups. These groups can take on an artificial nature, where an entrepreneur establishes the captive and offers coverage to unrelated insured parties. The insured group itself can be composed of diverse or homogeneous entities. Typically, this structure adopts a corporate framework with multiple classes of shares. These distinct share classes allow the group to implement a dividend policy that reflects the actual claims profile of each individual member within the group or association. Managing a group or association captive can present challenges, as it can bring forth risk-related issues that extend beyond the group itself, such as implementing appropriate loss control measures and ensuring that all members are adequately prepared for future claims. Cooperation and harmonious collaboration among the members play a crucial role in this dynamic. When in comparison with single-parent captives, group and association captives allow multiple businesses to pool their resources and risks together, which can result in accessing coverage or limits that may be otherwise unavailable or costly for individual entities. By sharing the risk collectively, the group/association can negotiate more comprehensive and competitive insurance coverage. Additionally, by diversifying their risks and spreading the costs of administration across multiple members, the captive helps mitigate the impact of individual losses, and overall expenses are reduced, making the business more cost-effective for each participant. 4) Rent-a-Captive Rent-a-Captive aka Rental captives emerged as a popular alternative over two decades ago in response to the expenses associated with establishing and operating a captive. In this arrangement, the potential insured seeks out an existing captive, often owned by a traditional insurer, which establishes a separate financial record within its own structure to account for the specific risk of the potential insured. However, this approach typically limits the choices available for risk-sharing partners and service providers.
49
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker