In the model above, the sponsor is the primary entity behind the foundation of the rent-a-captive and plays a central role in its operations. The sponsor typically owns or controls the rent-a- captive and provides the initial capital necessary for its formation. They also assume responsibility for managing the captive and overseeing its day-to-day activities. The sponsor’s involvement is vital as they provide the expertise and resources needed to establish and operate the rent-a-captive effectively. Below this, the fronting carrier is an insurance company that acts as an intermediary between the rental captive and the insured parties. They issue insurance policies on behalf of the rent-a- captive and handle administrative tasks, such as policy underwriting, premiums collection, and claims management. The fronting carrier assumes a crucial role in the rental captive structure by providing the necessary regulatory and legal compliance required to operate within the insurance market. Next, the concept of a cell is employed to segregate the risks and assets of different insured parties. Each cell functions as an independent entity within the captive, allowing multiple insured parties to participate while maintaining separation and protection of their respective risks. The use of cells enables insured parties to participate while maintaining separation and protection of their respective risks. The use of cells enables insured parties to enjoy the benefits of captive arrangements, such as risk management and potential cost savings, all while maintaining their own distinct risk profiles. Last in the cycle, the reinsurer provides additional risk transfer capacity to the captive by assuming a portion of the risks underwritten by the rental captive, thereby reducing the overall risk exposure of the captive and ensuring its financial stability. The reinsurer’s involvement is crucial as it enhances the capacity and credibility of the rental captive to underwrite larger or more complex risks. Therefore, utilizing someone else's captive as a cell entity entails incurring additional wrangling costs, although these may be offset by avoiding the expenses involved in setting up and managing an independent facility. It is crucial to thoroughly understand and compare these costs, while also carefully considering issues related to control and selecting partners/providers, before deciding on a rental captive. Some rental facilities have also encountered challenges with their risk-sharing partners due to inadequate reserves for future losses. Before committing to a rental facility, engaging in a discussion with the primary risk-sharing partner regarding their reserving practices is essential. Additionally, it may be prudent to consider an independent actuarial review of the reserves to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the facility's financial soundness. 5) Protected Cell Captive The Segregated Protected Cell, also known as a sponsored captive, involves the establishment of cells within an existing insurer or "captive" owned by an insurance company or service provider. While the procedures for setting up a single-parent captive are followed, the ultimate regulatory approval is not required as the regulators rely on the sponsor for compliance with regulations.
51
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker