Raise Foundation | Evaluation Report 2024
40
The Raise impact over time
Outcome
Measure
2024 2023 2022 2021
2020
Enjoyed the program Things are different
Proportion Proportion
97% 97% 99% 97% 98%
75%
77% 77% 78% 79%
Yes ~ 0.3~
Asking for help
Statistically significant impact
Yes
Yes 0.47 Yes 0.16 Yes
Yes
N/A N/A
Effect size
0.39
0.36
Yes ~ 0.32 ~
Resilience
Statistically significant impact
Yes
Yes
Yes
Effect size
0.34
0.24
0.1
Yes ~
Hope for the future
Statistically significant impact
Yes
Yes
Yes 0.18 N/A N/A
0.26 0.39 0.38 0.8 ~
Effect size
Yes ~ 0.81 ~
Yes ~ 0.2 ~
School belonging
Statistically significant impact
Yes 0.19
Yes 0.27
Effect size
Rated their connection with their mentor as favourable (excellent or very good)
90
90
94
Said mentoring helped them with mental health or personal issues
74%
78% 77% 74%
Note 1: ~ For mentees who started with a low score at the start of the program
A note about the statistical methodology we use We use a repeated-sample t-test (or paired t-test) methodology to determine whether any changes in outcomes between the pre-program measure and the post-program measure are statistically significant. We test at a 5 per cent level of significance.
To determine the threshold for the ‘low starting score’ cohorts for each outcome we use, where possible, accepted or recommended cutoff points. Where there are no recommended cutoff points (for example for Raise-designed measures) we have set cutoff points based on data characteristics and tested these using sensitivity analysis.
““My mentor was very understanding and reassured, my mentor also helped me understand how I can move on. My mentor also helped me realise that I had all the skills I needed I just didn't realise I had them.” - 2024 Raise Mentee
Made with FlippingBook Converter PDF to HTML5