Mathematica 2014

20

Proof by Induction or Contradiction By Ayman D’Souza

Very often in Mathematics we find ourselves needing to prove something: a formula, a fact, a theorem. But what do we do when we can no longer use a 3 ଶ as 9x= 3*3*x? Very often, we can use the method of Proof by Induction, or Proof by Contradiction. In this article I will explain both methods by employing the use of examples. Proof by Induction ଵ ଶ n (n +1) If we already know that to find the value of this some we should take the average simple proof, e.g. 9x must be divisible by We are given the arithmetic progression: 1 + 2 + 3 + ..... + n = sense. But how could prove it by induction? Let us assume that the arithmetic progression is true for n = k, rewriting the formula as: ଵ ଶ k (k + 1 ) If it is true for all values, we can fill the formula in with k + 1 as well as k, reading: {Formula A}: 1 + 2 + 3 + ..... + k = ( ଵ ଶ k + 1 ) (k + 1 ) = ଵ ଶ (k + 1 ) (k + 2 ) We can manipulate the right hand side of the formula to resemble the left hand side ଵ ଶ (k + 1 ) not affecting the overall value. Since we have proved that the original statement to prove works for n + 1 (remember n represents k ), it logically works for any integer equal to or larger than one, and so we have proved the formula to work for any value of n . Proof by Contradiction Often, is something is untrue, we can prove this by contradicting it. For example, let ௔ ௕ is cancelled down as far as possible) which we can contradict to prove the square root of two is an irrational number, similarly to pi. if we halve (k + 2 ), and double us take the example √2 ൌ ௔ ௕ (assuming that and multiply it by the number of terms, the formula ଵ ଶ n (n +1) makes perfect {Formula B}: 1 + 2 + 3 + ..... + k + (k + 1 ) = ଵ ଶ (k + 1 ) ((k + 1 ) + 1 ) Since we already know that 1 + 2 + 3 + ..... + k = ଵ ଶ k (k + 1 ) {Formula A} , we can rewrite the {Formula B} above as: ଵ ଶ k (k + 1 ) + (k + 1 ) = ଵ ଶ (k + 1 ) (k + 2 )

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker