These options will be judged against a consistent set of criteria to determine which best serves the needs of our entire community. 4.0 How the Options Are Being Evaluated To ensure a fair and thorough analysis, the district and the AB Forward Steering Committee are using a consistent set of criteria to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each reorganization option. ● Projected Cost This criterion examines the financial implications of each option. It asks about the upfront versus ongoing costs, potential savings, and how well the short-term costs align with the goal of long-term financial sustainability for the district. ● Impact on Staffing This looks at how each option would affect our educators and staff. It considers how staffing needs might change, the potential effects on workload, and how the changes could impact staff recruitment and retention. ● Impact on Students & Families This focuses on the human side of the change. It assesses how many people will be affected, whether the impact is equitable across different student groups, and how the changes might strengthen or challenge community trust. ● Implications for Curriculum, Materials & Support This criterion evaluates the academic and support needs associated with each option. It asks if new programs or curricula would be required, what resources might need to be updated, and what professional learning would be needed to support educators through the transition. ● Summarized Strengths and Drawbacks This provides a final, high-level summary of the primary benefits and disadvantages of each option, helping to clarify the key trade-offs involved in making a decision. Beyond these criteria, there are other important concepts, like school mergers and enrollment policies, that are relevant to several of the options.
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software