Long-term outcomes

Long-term outcomes after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) for hematologic malignancies Supawee Saengboon, Jeremy Ramdial, Neeraj Saini, Amanda Olson, Jin Im, Chitra Hosing, Uday Popat, Elizabeth Shpall, Richard E. Champlin and Samer A. Srour Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

Abstract (Click on the text to edit) Background

Variable

All Patients

2-year landmark

(N=366)

(N=144)

Age years

• Allogeneic SCT is curative for large proportion of patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies • The introduction of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis led to significant improvements in haplo-SCT outcomes and a remarkable increase in its use in the past decade • We aimed from this study to assess long-term outcomes of patients who underwent haplo-SCT

Median (range)

48 (18-72)

45 (18-72)

Age at transplant

<55 years

206 (61.31%)

97 (67.36%)

≥55 years

130 (38.69%)

47 (32.64%)

Gender

Male

196 (58.33%)

84 (58.33%)

Female

140 (41.67%)

60 (41.67%)

Figure 1

Figure 2

Disease Subtype

AML/MDS

196 (58.33%)

80 (55.56%)

ALL

55 (16.37%)

22 (15.28%)

MPN

37 (11.01%)

22 (15.28%)

Lymphoid malignancies

48 (14.29%)

20 (13.89%)

Methods

KPS at transplant

Figure 3

KPS 90-100

207 (68.32%)

93 (69.92%)

Results Continued

KPS<90

96 (31.68%)

40 (30.08%)

• All consecutive adult patients who had their first haplo- SCT between 2/2009 and 3/2019 • Long-term survivors defined as patients who were alive and disease free at 2 years after transplant ✓ Primary end points: PFS and OS ✓ Secondary endpoints: cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) Results • Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics of all patients and the long-term survivors • The 4-year PFS and OS for all study patients were 42% and 47% • With a median follow-up of 52 months for the long- term survival group, the 4-year PFS and OS were 92% and 96%, respectively (Figure 1&2)

DRI

Low/Intermediate DRI

189 (58.88%)

100 (72.46%)

High/Very High DRI

132 (41.12%)

38 (27.54%)

• In MVA, age ≥ 55 was the only predictive for inferior PFS (HR 2.63, 95% CI: 1.01-6.84; p=0.047) and OS (HR 3.33, 95% CI: 1.08-12.23; p=0.036)

HCT-CI

HCT- CI ≤ 3

218 (64.88%)

101 (70.14%)

HCT-CI>3

118 (35.12%)

43 (29.86%)

Stem cell source

Peripheral blood

54 (16.07%)

18 (12.50%)

• Figure 3 shows NRM and CIR rates

Bone marrow

282 (83.93%)

126 (87.50%)

Conditioning regimen

• Thirteen patients (9%) died in the long-term survivor group: ✓ Two died of relapse ✓ Secondary primary malignancy was the most frequent cause of NRM (n=4) ✓ Two patients died from infection ✓ One patient each from GVHD and sudden death ✓ For 3 patients, the cause of death was unknown

Reduced intensity

298 (88.69%)

127 (88.19)

Conclusion

Myeloablative

38 (11.31%)

17 (11.81%)

Patient-Donor CMV

R-R

186 (64.14%)

79 (66.39%)

• Our findings suggest an excellent long-term survival for patients who were disease-free at 2 years after haplo-SCT • Late relapses were low • Age was the only predictive factor for survival

R-NR

104 (35.86%)

40 (33.61%)

Acute GVHD Gr2-4 at 2 years

No

192 (57.14%)

90 (62.50%)

Yes

144 (42.86%)

54 (37.50%)

Chronic GVHD at 2 years

No

291 (86.61%)

116 (80.56%)

Yes

45 (13.39%)

28 (19.44%)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Page 1

Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease