22535 - SCTE Broadband - Feb2026 COMPLETE v1

FROM THE INDUSTRY

compromising performance. Achieving that balance requires moving beyond generic security models toward precise, intelligence-driven approaches and real-time edge actions that distinguish malicious activity from legitimate demand and enable immediate action. In this context, effective anti-piracy is increasingly aligned with QoE optimisation and viewer trust, helping ensure that premium live content performs as expected for its intended audiences. Piracy patterns are not universal Another complex aspect is that online piracy does not manifest uniformly across markets. Its patterns vary by geography, device type, access network and even individual events, shaped by local regulatory frameworks, enforcement practices and consumer behaviour. Across regions such as APAC and MENA, market conditions and regulatory approaches differ from country to country, leading media companies to adopt proactive anti-piracy strategies tailored to local risk profiles and audience

Piracy’s direct impact on QoE and viewer performance For end users, the effects of piracy-related congestion manifest as QoE issues. Live streaming audiences are highly sensitive to startup time, latency and playback continuity, especially during premium events where expectations are highest. When unlicensed traffic consumes capacity at peak moments, legitimate viewers may experience buffering, increased delay or inconsistent performance, regardless of the quality of the underlying content or platform delivering the stream. At the same time, the way anti-piracy measures are applied can also influence QoE outcomes. Overly broad or blunt security measures can do more harm than good because they introduce additional latency, slow response times or inadvertently disrupt legitimate users. For live streaming in particular, even small delays can have outsized effects, and if poorly targeted anti-piracy controls degrade the experience for paying viewers, they risk becoming counterproductive. This creates a real balancing act: protecting content and revenue without

Live streaming has become a defining feature of today’s digital economy. From major sports tournaments and international cultural events to breaking news and entertainment, audiences increasingly expect flawless, real-time video experiences at massive scale. Yet as live streaming grows in reach and value, so does content piracy, particularly during high-profile, high-concurrency events. What was once viewed primarily as a legal or rights-management concern has increasingly become a critical operational challenge for networks, CDNs and broadband providers. As national-scale streaming events shift from exception to expectation, the industry must recognise that anti-piracy is inseparable from network performance, directly affecting Quality of Experience (QoE), latency and service reliability for legitimate viewers. When piracy becomes a QoS and operational network issue Studies from the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) show that consumption of pirated live sports and TV content continues to rise in Europe, with streaming now the primary method of access, accounting for 58% of piracy consumption compared with 32% via downloading. These figures are often translated primarily into financial losses for rights holders and broadcasters. However, an equally important and frequently underestimated dimension is the impact on Quality of Service (QoS) at the network level felt across the entire delivery chain. Unauthorised redistribution, illicit stream embedding and CDN leeching place measurable strain on delivery infrastructures. For ISPs, this translates into direct operational implications, such as unnecessary bandwidth consumption, inflated delivery costs and less efficient use of capacity. As a matter of fact, piracy- driven traffic competes with legitimate streams for network resources, reducing predictability and complicating capacity planning, mostly during large-scale live events. As national-scale streaming becomes more common, unplanned traffic surges associated with illicit redistribution increase congestion risk across access and aggregation networks, impacting overall service stability, efficiency and reliability for all stakeholders.

Volume 48 No.1 MARCH 2026

77

Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker