Rethinking financial resilience in the AI era

Costs businesses are most likely to miss

The true cost of AI goes beyond the technology

Lenders are looking beyond the headline cost of AI tools; 44% say businesses are most likely to underestimate cybersecurity costs, with data infrastructure and legal and regulatory compliance close behind at 36% each, and integration and licensing costs not far off.

AI-related costs lenders say businesses most often underestimate

Cybersecurity

Data infrastructure

Legal, regulatory and compliance risk

Integration with legacy systems

Software and licensing

Training and workforce trends

10

20

30

40

50

0

The financial impact of failed AI initiatives When artificial intelligence investments fail to meet expectations, the financial fallout has the potential to destabilise a business. Lenders expect under-performing AI investment to show up in core financial measures such as; weaker revenue growth (39%), lower margins (37%) and more cash flow pressure (34%). That pressure can influence the funding decision itself as, 45% of lenders say weak AI readiness could lead to less favourable lending margins, 43% say it would reduce their confidence in forecasts, and 35% say it could change the structure or timing of lending. Why cash flow becomes the pressure point Timing matters as much as total return as businesses typically spend the cash before the benefits arrive, liquidity can tighten even when the long term case still stands up. Cash flow forecasting and scenario planning should sit at the centre of AI governance. Boards need to understand what happens if benefits are delayed or reduced, what headroom exists and what triggers action. Lenders need the same evidence to assess covenants, borrowing needs and resilience.

8

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online