CATEGORY: INNOVATION IN OVERCOMING OBSTACLES
Forging the Future B Y RYAN VOGEL The world of defense acquisition is often perceived as a maze of rigid processes, budgetary constraints, and unyielding timelines— a system that can stifle the very innovation it seeks to foster. When I took on a leadership role within the B-21 Air Vehicle (AV) Team, I was acutely aware of this perception. Our mission was monumental: to deliver the nation’s first sixth-generation long-range strike bomber, a task defined by a historically compressed engineering-to-acquisition timeline for an $80 billion program. The pressure was immense, driven by a national security im- perative that demanded speed without sacrificing an ounce of technical rigor. The primary obstacle was not a single technical glitch or a specific funding shortfall, but the cumulative weight of immense complexity. My independent judgment was clear from the outset: to succeed, we could not simply work within the system; we had to make the system work for us, transform- ing its perceived obstacles into opportunities for groundbreaking innovation. Our team orchestrated a symphony of technical innovation and collaborative engineering, dedicating over 850 man-days to plane-side support and real-time data analysis to propel the B-21 to a successful Milestone-C decision. A foundational challenge that confronted my team was ensuring the structural integrity and manufacturability of a revolution- ary composite airframe. The risks were colossal, with the potential for a catastrophic loss of an aircraft. Traditional, sequential risk-reduction methods—where one team completes its analysis before handing a mountain of documents “over the wall” to the next—were far too slow and siloed to be effective. Recognizing this, I championed the formation of a cross-functional Joint Review Team, bringing our top engineers into direct, daily collaboration with technical experts from Northrop Grumman, the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), and the System Program Office (SPO). Instead of a linear process, we pursued a massive, parallel testing campaign, executing over 45,000 coupon, 9,000 element, and 270 sub-component tests to date. This data blitz gave us a holistic, real-time understanding of material performance, al- lowing us to validate our innovative composite design, drastically reduce airworthiness risk, and save millions per aircraft in potential production repairs. This spirit of challenging the status quo directly led to one of our most impactful innovations. The conventional wisdom for validating composite aircraft structures demanded extensive and expensive full-scale structural proof testing. My team and I questioned its necessity, as we believed that with sufficient data and advanced inspection techniques, we could certify the structure with equal or greater confidence. We leveraged our deep partnership with AFRL to pioneer a new best practice for non-destructive inspection (NDI). By scientifi- cally correlating our vast repository of sub-component test data with advanced NDI readings, we built an irrefutable, data-driven case proving we could guarantee structural integrity. The impact was immediate and profound. This single innovation generates a staggering $47 million in cost avoidance for every aircraft we produce. Furthermore, by avoiding time-consuming repairs, we cut manufacturing time by half a day per instance, projecting a cumulative two months of schedule savings per aircraft, thereby accelerating the delivery of this critical capability to the warfighter. However, these physical innovations were only possible because we simultaneously revolutionized the very processes that govern our work. The sheer volume of data, design changes, and compliance artifacts threatened to drown our most talented engineers in administrative burden. I challenged my team to digitize and automate our way to efficiency. We analyzed and process-mapped our entire Airworthiness (AW) process, digitally implementing it in Jira and Confluence. The old way of paper forms, disconnected spreadsheets, and endless review meetings was replaced. Instead of waiting for engineers to compile rigorous and time-consuming detailed reports, we created a system where we could conduct airworthiness evaluations in near real-time. The digital thread of linked data, analysis, and decisions within Jira became the living documentation, eliminating the need to produce static reports after the fact. We automated the impact determination process for design changes using a simple Jira Query Language (JQL) filter, which also triggered an automated export of the Form-110 for record-keeping. This elegant solution pulled the entire determination process “to the left,” creating a repeatable, audit-ready system that helped us secure additional delegated authorities for our Chief Engineer. This digital framework became the backbone for managing all modifications to the platform design. We developed and imple- mented a new, digitally based process to document, assess, and approve changes. This digital thread allowed us to collaborate seamlessly with the contractor on over 360 modifications, adjudicate 195 of them, and implement 159, all with a complete, readily available digital audit trail. To foster a true partnership, I established a bi-weekly collaborative forum with the OEM’s airworthiness team, replacing a traditionally formal relationship with an open channel focused on a shared goal. This gave us crucial early visibility into upcom- ing configuration changes. The tangible result of this process innovation was gaining the trust of the Technical Airworthiness
48 DEFENSE ACQUISITION MAGAZINE | JULY – AUGUST 2026
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker