Witness Statement of Charlie Boss and Exhibit CB1

Docusign Envelope ID: ABA671A3-E271-4EC4-AB06-1088FEC37456

course as the horses approached them, which could have led to loss of life. I refer also to

the statement of PC Hodgkins, who apprehended Mr Newman, who says that he was in

genuine fear for his safety and was scared he was going to be seriously injured. PC Stevens

also stated she was concerned for the safety of individuals who were dealing with Mr

Newman, due to the high-risk situation that he had created.

38. Should further people (for example, members of the public) enter the Race Track, either to

assist the stewards and the police, or to further the protest, then the danger to life would

only increase. Moreover , delayed and cancelled races, and possible conflicts between

protesters and the public, create increased risks relating to crowd-control, hostilities and

anti-social behaviour.

Additional Event Costs and Organisation

39. As a result of the threats of trespass and disruption, and the acts of the Ninth Defendant at

the 2023 Derby, the Claimant has had to divert management time away from the normal

running of its business at significant cost and detriment to the Claimant.

40. Due to the remaining threat of disruption, the additional security measures deployed in 2023

were again required at the 2024 and 2025 Epsom Festivals, at further significant cost to the

Claimant. The costs of the additional security measures at the 2023 Grand National and the

2023 Derby, and additional burden, are detailed in Truesdale 1, paragraphs 57 to 59 and

61. In particular, we have a ‘silver control’ tactical command in place on the weekend in

order to manage operations and any disruption effectively. This is a temporary compound

on the racecourse at Tattenham corner which contains CCTV of the Racecourse. Surrey

Police and other emergency staff are housed in this compound for the duration of the Derby

Festival so that they can monitor and manage any disruption or issues that may arise. This

is only in place for the Derby Festival. This was in place prior to the 2023 Derby Festival and

it remained in place for the 2025 Derby Festival.

41. As noted at paragraph 60 of Truesdale 1, Surrey Police indicated its support for the interim

injunction application, and the Claimant was in constant dialogue with Surrey Police

surrounding the 2023 Derby Festival. The Claimant remains in constant dialogue with

Surrey Police regarding the Derby Festivals and Surrey Police continued to monitor the

threat of any disruptive protest activity in the lead up to the 2025 Derby Festival.

Wider Impact on the Claimant’s Business and the sport

42. Disruptive protests have a wide- ranging and serious impact on the Claimant’s business and

legitimate commercial interests, and the sport in general. For example, the commercial

success and longevity of the Claimant, and horse racing more widely, directly depends on

revenue from sponsors, audiences and broadcast partners and all commercial activity.

Disruption to the races, and the broadcast schedule, seriously threaten this. Moreover,

16

Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Creator