(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
Figure 2: Optical images of as-welded microstructures of (a) Electrode 2, showing a martensitic matrix with δ -ferrite in the last-deposited beads, and (b) Electrode 3, showing martensitic matrix with δ -ferrite in the fusion line between the weld beads. 200 × magnification. Experimental procedure A P91 sectioned pipe with a thickness of 40 mm was used as the base metal for the weld pads. Figure 1(a) shows a photograph of the sectioned weld pad. A stereoscope image of the weld pad cross section is shown in Figure 1(b). Two weld pads were prepared from each electrode, each with a size of 20 ×25 ×70 mm. One weld pad was deposited with the base metal preheated to 200 °C, and the inter-pass temperature maintained at a minimum value of 200 °C during welding. The other weld pad received no preheating. Table 1 shows typical weld metal compositions of the electrodes (designated Electrodes 1, 2, 3, and 4) as supplied by the respective manufacturers. P91 welds usually receive a temper treatment at a minimum temperature of 730 °C for 2:00 h to achieve optimum mechanical properties, but in the current investigation, the pads were analysed in the as-welded condition. Table 2 presents the chemical compositions of the four weld pads, performed on the last bead deposited using the optical emission spectrograph (OES) technique. Electrodes 1 and 3 fully complied with the EN ISO 3580-A CrMo91 specification. Electrode 2 had very low nickel and high niobium contents, and Electrode 4 had carbon content above the maximum allowable limit. Thermo-Calc version 2019b thermodynamic software was used with the TCFE7 database to perform one-axis equilibrium calculations based on the actual chemical compositions of the welds shown in Table 2. The equilibrium transformation sequence and temperatures were hence determined. An equilibrium phase diagram was constructed for the P91 composition with a range of mass percentage chromium. Individual phase diagrams with elemental range of carbon, nickel, and niobium were also con- structed because they fall outside the composition specification limits for Electrodes 2 and 4.
Figure 3: Optical microstructure images of welds annealed at 1 320 °C for 1:00 h: (a) Electrode 2, comprising a martensitic matrix with 23% δ -ferrite; and (b) Electrode 3, comprising a martensitic matrix with about 2% δ -ferrite. 200 × magnification. High-temperature anneal heat treatments were carried out at 1 320 and 1 420 °C with soaking times of 60 min followed by a sub- sequent water quench. The heat-treated samples with dimensions of 10×10x5 mm were sectioned from the weld pads. The annealing was done on a vertical tube furnace under an argon gas atmosphere with an external thermocouple inserted to verify the temperatures during heat treatment. Optical metallography and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS) were carried out on the weld pads in both the as-welded and high-temperature an- nealed conditions. The phase fraction calculation of the microstruc- tures was performed through ImageJ area fraction measurement. Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis was performed on the as-welded samples only, using a Joel JSM instrument at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and working distance of 10 mm. Results and discussion The as-welded optical microstructure of Electrode 2, shown in Figure 2(a), indicated about 13% volume fraction of δ -ferrite in the weld metal of the last-deposited beads. In contrast, that of Electrode 3, shown in Figure 2(b), showed martensitic matrix with small amounts (0.4%) of δ -ferrite retained in the fusion line between the weld beads. Weld metals of Electrodes 1 and 4 were fully martensitic. The use of preheating (200 °C) did not change the amount of δ -ferrite in the Electrode 2 weld metal. An optical image of the Electrode 2 weld annealed at 1 320 °C (Figure 3(a)) showed that the microstructure consisted of a martensitic matrix with 23% δ -ferrite. Electrode 3, shown in Fig- ure 3(b), consisted of a martensitic matrix with about 2% δ -ferrite. No δ -ferrite was observed in Electrodes 1 and 4 weld metals that were heat-treated at 1 320 °C. The volume fraction of δ -ferrite observed in Electrode 2, shown
Table 1: Typical analysis of weld metal (mass%), as supplied by electrode manufacturers.
C
Mn
Cr
Si
Mo
V
Nb
Ni
EN ISO 3580-A CrMo91 (Stndrd) 0.06-0.12
0.4-1.5
8.0-10.5
0.6 max 0.8-1.2
0.15-0.30
0.03-0.10 0.4-1.0
P91 Electrode 1 P91 Electrode 2 P91 Electrode 3 P91 Electrode 4
0.10 0.09 0.10 0.09
0.6 1.0 0.7 0.6
8.5 9.0 9.0 9.0
0.2 0.2 0. 4 0.2
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1
0.20 0.22 0.20 0.20
0.06 0.07 0.06 0.05
0.5
-
0.7 0.8
Table 2: Average chemical composition (mass%) of weld metal pads (EN ISO 3580-A CrMo91).
C
Mn
Cr
Si
Mo
V
Nb
N
Ni
Al
EN ISO 3580-A CrMo91 (Stndrd) P91 Electrode 1 P91 Electrode 2 P91 Electrode 3 P91 Electrode 4
0.06-0.12 0.4-1.5 8.0-10.5
0.6 max 0.8-1.2
0.15-0.30 0.03-0.10 0.02-0.07 0.4-1.0 -
0.12 0.10 0.12 0.15
0.58 0.98 0.74 0.52
9.31 9.92 9.34
0.21 0.43 0.36 0.22
1.05 1.13 1.01 1.06
0.22 0.24 0.27 0.22
0.076 0.144 0.065 0.071
0.043 0.038 0.031 0.027
0.44 0.05 0.68 0.74
≤ 0.005 ≤ 0.005 ≤ 0.005 ≤ 0.005
10.30
13
November 2022
AFRICAN FUSION
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker