04:05
ISSUE 6
Integrations also have the benefit of providing the best of two systems, all the while avoiding the troubles associated with adopting a new HRIS (employee training, adaptation period, human errors...). While there is an initial time and financial investment, integrations such as these typically make for an optimal, smooth-running system in the long run.
Data security and confidentiality To communicate between two HRIS without an integration might mean sending confidential information via means such as emails, for instance. Naturally, this compromises security. Through the creation of an API, safety standards can more easily be met, and data security can be preserved. No need for costly new systems The overhaul of an old system can be extremely costly, not just in financial terms but in terms of time and effort as well. Since an integration brings together the best of two systems, companies save on costs when compared to the costs of a complete system overhaul. No need for staff training Because the interface employees are used to remains the same during an integration, there is no need for intensive staff training and for lengthy adaptation periods which include the very real possibility of human errors. Cons: API development time, testing phase and implementation The whole process of an API implementation, from beginning to end, can take up to 6 months and possibly more depending on the changes being made.
Author: Eddie Van Zyl
Eddie Van Zyl is a passionate Africa Payroll Specialist at Africa HR Solutions.
As a certified Sage 300 Payroll and HR Consultant with over 15 years of experience, Eddie specialises in full payroll project implementations, upgrades, and integrations. Prior to joining Africa HR Solutions, Eddie worked 13 consecutive years as a Senior Payroll Consultant for Sage.
Is it worth it? Yes.
Integrations, such as this one, are clearly worth it for companies that require new features to support their growth.
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter maker