APPENDICES
Perspectives from Lived Experience Throughout the Ethnicity Pay Gap Conference 2025, speakers and attendees offered powerful reflections on their lived experiences within workplaces that often claim inclusivity in principle but fall short in practice. These testimonies provided a vital human lens to the data, reminding us that behind every percentage point is a person navigating systems that are not always built for their success. Participants shared deeply personal accounts of: Being repeatedly overlooked for promotion, despite consistent high performance and qualifications equal to, or exceeding, those of their peers. Navigating implicit bias and microaggressions, often feeling pressure to ‘overperform’ in order to be seen as competent, credible, or ‘leadership material’. Feeling emotionally exhausted by the unspoken expectation to represent their entire ethnic group or explain their presence in professional spaces. Frustration with performative gestures, where organisations collect data, commission reports, or host diversity events without translating these efforts into concrete change. A recurring theme was the emotional toll of constantly having to justify one’s place, challenge assumptions, or manage exclusion in environments that publicly promote equity but fail to deliver it meaningfully. This dissonance between organisational messaging and lived reality can foster disillusionment, disengagement, and increase attrition, especially when efforts toward equity are experienced as symbolic rather than structural. Another consistent message was a desire for visible, sustained action. Participants called for inclusion to be embedded not just in strategy documents, but in the systems that govern promotions, pay progression, and leadership development. Data collection, they argued, must lead to accountable action, and storytelling should not be used to inspire temporary empathy, but to inform systemic transformation. These lived experiences are not anecdotal, they are patterns. And they underscore the urgency of moving from metrics to meaning, ensuring that the commitment to racial equity shows up not only in presentations, but in policies, pipelines, and paycheques. APPENDIX B: DATA TABLES AND CHARTS Summary of ONS Ethnicity Pay Gap Data (2012–2022) Examples of sector-specific pay gap figures (where available) Disaggregated sample pay gap breakdown by role, grade, and ethnicity Illustration of "Simpson’s Paradox" in aggregated data sets Chart: Comparative progression rates of ethnic minority vs. White employees across sectors Change the Race Ratio: 2024 Progress Report
38
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker