Latest Update

Update In January 2025, St. Louis County Associate Circuit Judge, Joseph L. Green, filed a judgement in St. Louis County Court which indicates that he presided over a modification of the custody of my two teenage sons. That judgement is easily identified as fraudulent. For the last eight years I have been their sole legal/physical custodian, and their sole financial provider. My sons have had no contact of any kind with their father, Victor A. Ojeda, since the last time he had a supervised visit in May 2021, nearly four years ago. In addition, since July 2018, Mr. Ojeda has been prevented from engaging in any form of contact with me as the result of The Court’s Orders . There are multiple judgements in The Court’s Record since that time, which indicate that Mr. Ojeda has continued to harass my sons and I since 2018, despite The Court’s Orders preventing his contact with us. Judge Green recounts the testimony of a therapist named Camille Reinhold in this January 2025 judgement, from a trial he claims took place in his division in June 2024, however it took him over seven months to enter a judgement from the date of that alleged trial. My sons and I have never met a therapist named Camille Reinhold. At no time did we participate in what are referred to in the judgement as “therapeutic visits” with Mr. Ojeda and Ms. Reinhold. We have never been seen or evaluated by this therapist, nor have we engaged in communication of any kind with her or Mr. Ojeda. My sons are just two months shy of turning 15 and 18. Judge Green’s fraudulent judgement is accessible by anyone online at https:// www.courts.mo.gov/. One can imagine how psychologically and emotionally distressing it would be for two teenagers to know there is a public record that is readily accessible to anyone online, which describes how they participated in therapy and contact with their known abuser, when they never did, and the person who created that fraudulent record is a judge. Let alone to have negative predictions about their future mental health and relationships to be asserted by Judge Green, based on a lie about that fictional contact, in a document visible to anyone online. Judge Green states that I also took part in these “therapeutic visits” with Mr. Ojeda and Camille Reinhold, when I have never participated in any such activity or contact. Judge Green also makes reference to the “relationship” and interactions between Mr. Ojeda and I, when it is clear from The Court’s July 2018 Judgement alone, that Mr. Ojeda is restricted by court order from having any communication or contact with me, so there could be no relationship or interactions to comment on. Judge Green states in his fraudulent January 2025 Judgement that I was diagnosed by Ms. Reinhold with multiple mental health conditions, when I have never met this individual and have never been diagnosed with any such “mental health issue” as he describes. There were no valid legal processes in Judge Green’s Division beginning in The Summer of 2022 related to my sons. What did happen was beginning in April 2022, I began formally reporting that Judge Green was committing fraud in my 1

divorce from a local attorney, Richard A. Voytas, in a case which no one can access the case record because it is filed under the highest level of security a ff orded by The Court. If anyone looks up The St. Louis County Court Records that are available to the public, they won’t know that Judge Green was already caught committing the same kind of fraud in my divorce from Mr. Voytas when he started creating a public record which undermines my credibility and the credibility of my sons. The twelve pages that compose Judge Green’s January 2025 “Modification of Custody Judgement” are filled with fraudulent information, including a “procedural history” outlined by Judge Green which can be disproven by comparing what he states; to the actual orders and judgements entered by other judges over the last nine years. That is why I had no choice but to upload all of those previous court documents onto my website. I did so in chronological order to make it easier for someone to compare what Judge Green falsely asserts in his “judgement”, to what is true, accurate, and supported by orders and judgements filed in The Court’s Record. Material facts include things like the existence of prior judgements, whether certain legal processes did or did not take place, whether someone engaged in therapy or submitted to a psychological evaluation, whether there is an open criminal investigation on someone, etc. The Civil Rights Crime that I have been accusing Judge Green of for over three years now, can easily be proven or disproven by comparing the past court records that Judge Green misrepresents, in the new orders and judgements he has created. However, if someone is claiming a crime is being committed by a large group of legal professionals, which includes judges, people are going to believe it’s more likely that the person reporting the crime must be “crazy” if they are not represented by an attorney in making these claims. Particularly if there is a recent court judgement entered by Judge Green which states that my sons and I participated in therapeutic visits and mental health evaluations with a therapist and our known domestic abuser, Victor A. Ojeda, and were subsequently determined not to be credible and to have “mental health issues”, among countless other lies. It makes it very easy for any potential source of help to disregard my pleas for a criminal investigation, based on the publicly available fraudulent record related to Mr. Ojeda, which was created by Judge Green after I was already accusing him of this same crime in my divorce from St. Louis Attorney Richard A. Voytas, which is not visible to the public. It makes it appear that there is a “high-conflict” custody matter between my first-husband and known domestic abuser, Victor A. Ojeda, and I, which I am disgruntled about. People naturally assume it’s a complicated legal matter when they see a 12-page judgement. In reality, I am reporting criminal fraud that is so well- documented and blatant, that it can be identified by anyone because it’s a matter of reality and fiction, not a legal issue . There is a network of criminally-corrupt individuals, primarly composed of attorneys and judges, who participate every day in legal proceedings related to

2

vulnerable populations like domestic abuse victims and children, who are committing blatant fraud in records filed in St. Louis County Courts. There is enough evidence uploaded to my website alone to prove it. The only way for the perpetrators, and those with a professional interest in concealing their crime, have left to evade being caught is to discredit the source of that evidence. The truth will eventually come out because the evidence is too extensive. I would implore anyone reading this to review the evidence on my website independently, because if what I am saying is true, this is an emergency for St. Louis County Missouri’s Judicial Circuit as well as the local legal profession. The perpetrators pose a risk to the public at large given the fact they are using their positions as attorneys and judges to commit their crimes, and in this situation two of their three victims include minors.

To view document with in-text links to the documents cited, use this link: https://docsend.com/view/2cmf9fv64gcqwhhh

www.LitigantOnTheLoose.com

3

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

litigantontheloose.com

Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs