Lithia Pinecrest Network Analysis

ALT ERNAT I VE S TO W I D E N I NG LITHIA PINECREST

Table 5.

Alternative Set Performance Comparison, AM Peak

Roadway Segment

NB Lithia Pinecrest (Fishhawk to Bloomingdale)

NB Lithia Pinecrest (Bloomingdale to Lumsden)

WB Lumsden (Lithia Pinecrest to Brandon Parkway)

WB Bloomingdale (Lithia Pinecrest to Bell Shoals)

WB Bloomingdale (Bell Shoals to Kings)

NB Bell Shoals (Fishhawk to Bloomingdale)

WB Fishhawk (Lithia Pinecrest to Bell Shoals)

WB Bloomingdale - (Kings to US 301)

Scenario

AMVolume E+C+LP

1612 1668 1688 1609 1600 1654 1691 1596 1616 1654 0.94 0.98 0.99 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.99 0.94 0.95 0.97

2652 2741 2352 2858 2658 2756 2799 2836 2792 2355 1.60 1.65 1.42 1.72 1.60 1.66 1.69 1.71 1.68 1.42

2929 2894 2884 2926 2922 2929 2886 2867 2953 2759 1.64 1.62 1.62 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.62 1.60 1.66 1.55

1068 1145 1187 1136 1111 1090 1059 1453 1443 1481 0.71 0.77 0.79 0.76 0.74 0.73 0.71 0.97 0.97 0.99

1145 1179 1231 1175 1172 1147 1159 1339 1369 1347 1.30 1.33 0.77 0.74 0.73 0.72 0.73 0.84 0.86 0.84

888 819 763 810 876 834 846 578 571 585 0.56 1.01 0.94 1.00 1.01 0.96 0.53 0.51 0.51 0.52

903 800 610 754 878 826 761 743 737 599 0.56 0.97 0.73 0.91 0.81 0.76 0.92 0.90 0.89 0.72

2198 2161 2619 1945 2297 2091 1968 1897 2031 2478 1.16 1.14 0.99 1.04 0.89 0.95 1.05 0.88 0.95 0.95

E+C Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 Alt 6 Alt 7 Alt 8

AMV/C E+C+LP

E+C Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 Alt 6 Alt 7 Alt 8

<0.9 = not congested 0.9 to 1.0 = at capacity >1.0 = congested Level of Congestion Based on V/C Ratio

Percent Change in V/C Compared to E+C+LP Condition - > 50% - 30-50% - 10-30% -10% to +10% +10-30% + 30-50% + > 50% Reduction No Change Increase

Summary Report

60

Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog