Page 6 of 7
That means: • More diligence in gathering evidence – Seeking multiple sources to compensate for the lack of immediate peer review. • More discipline in framing the problem – Ensuring clarity without relying on group refinement. • More rigor in analyzing causes – Using conditional logic, testing for bias, and challenging assumptions without external input. • More creativity in generating solutions – Thinking beyond what’s easy, cheap, or familiar to truly alter context. • More intentionality in reporting – Structuring findings for clarity and ensuring they lead to action. It’s a lot. But it’s doable—especially when using structured approaches, cause patterns, and AI-powered tools like Causelink to provide additional perspectives, challenge assumptions, and enhance clarity. Ultimately, an individual-led RCA should aim to achieve the same quality and depth as a team-led RCA—it just requires more effort, more awareness, and a more deliberate approach to make it happen. By following the strategies shared in this blog, solo investigators can bring the benefits of team collaboration into their individual work —ensuring their RCA findings are just as thorough, insightful, and impactful.
© 2025 Sologic, LLC – All Rights Reserved
www.sologic.com
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online