7.1 Introduction
Examples of cooperative monitoring eforts
T ABLE 7.2
Initiative Plan Year and Name Atlantic Coast Joint Venture • 2002 Atlantic Brant Management Plan (ACJV) • 2005 ACJV Waterfowl Implementation Plan • 2008–13 Black Duck Joint Venture Strategic Plan
• 2010 Implementing the American Woodcock Conservation Plan • 2011 National Bobwhite Conservation Initiative
North American Waterfowl Management Plan (2012) South Atlantic Migratory Bird Initiative (SAMBI) (Watson et al. 2005) and Implementation Plan (Watson and Malloy 2006) U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan (Brown et al. 2001) North American Waterbird Conservation Plan (Kushlan et al. 2002) PIF North American Landbird Conservation Plan (Rich et al. 2004)
• 2004 Strategic Guide • 2012 NAWMP Action Plan
• 2004 Pelagic Bird Conservation Plan (SAMBI 2004)
• 2005 Southeastern Coastal Plain Bird Conservation Region 27 Conservation Design
• 2014 Piedmont Bird Conservation Region 29 Conservation Design
• 2002 Southeastern Coastal Plains-Caribbean Regional Shorebird Plan (Hunter et al. 2002)
• 2006 Southeast United States Regional Waterbird Conservation Plan (Hunter et al. 2006)
• 1999 Southern Blue Ridge (Hunter et al. 1999)
• 1999 Piedmont (Cooper and Demarest 1999) • 2001 South Atlantic Coastal Plain (Hunter et al. 2001) • 2004 Partners In Flight Continental Priorities and Objectives Defned at the State and Bird Conservation Region Levels (Rosenberg 2004) • Bird Conservation Plan for North Carolina (Johns 2005) • 2005 Monitoring Avian Winter Survival (MAWS) Program on four DOD Installations in Southeastern United States • 2008 Conserving Biodiversity on Military Lands • 2010 Legacy Resource Management Program, Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations in the Carolinas • 2012 Coordinated Bird Monitoring Technical Recommendations for Military Lands
Department of Defense
(DOD)
7.1.3 Indicators and Targets Te South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (SALCC) worked collaboratively with numerous agencies and organizations to develop natural resource indicators and targets based on ecological, practical, and social criteria (SALCC 2013) . Te ecological criteria focus on how well indicators capture key ecosystem elements and major landscape threats. Te practical criteria focus on the ability to monitor and model the indicators based on cur- rent resources and eforts. Te social criteria focus on how well the indicators resonate with
831
2015 NC Wildlife Action Plan
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online