8.3 Future Review and Revision
Summary of public review participation and disposition of comments
T ABLE 8.1
Number Received
Group Represented Private Citizens
Action Taken to Address Comments
4
Commenter 1: the WAP already addresses the topic; no action needed. Commenter 2: general in nature; no action needed. Commenter 3: regards game land management plans han- dled through a separate public review process; no action taken. Commenter 4: general in nature; no action needed. Commenter 5: hunting concerns handled through the rules and regulations process; no action needed. Commenter 6: regarding wind energy development; incor- porated as new information in Chapter 5 Treats. Commenter 7: from agency partner concerned updated website information and was incorporated as needed. Commenter 8: the WAP already addresses the topic; no action taken. Commenter 9: the WAP already addresses the topic or the WAP is not the appropriate forum to comment on proposed rules; no action needed. Commenter 10: general in nature and the WAP already contains information about the topic; no action needed. Commenter 11: for most, the WAP already addresses the topic and no action needed. Some comments will require further consideration to determine how best to address the topic; information may be incorporated during future revision.
3
State Agency
4
Special Interest Groups
8.3 Future Review and Revision Review, revision and maintenance of the WAP will require the continuation of all the activities that went into development of the document (e.g., communication and coordi- nation with partners, database updates), as well as the management of new activities (e.g., website updates, project implementation, evaluation, monitoring, adaptive management process). Maintenance activities will be primarily coordinated by NCWRC but will require regular communication with partners and stakeholders. Considering the electronic format of the Plan, it is anticipated that future revision will be a straightforward and streamlined process. Semi-annual reporting on projects and annual evaluation of project accomplishments by program supervisors are used to assess adaptive management needs on a project-by-proj- ect basis. Commission program supervisors and administration will assess individual project performance to determine if they are meeting program-level strategies on par
856
2015 NC Wildlife Action Plan
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online