3
*Note page 17, lines 16-23 and page 19, lines 16-19 where Judge Ott explicitly states she will not be hearing the “merits of the motion” at that time, because she needs to establish whether she is “procedurally postured” to do so. However she enters a judgement months later detailing that she did hear the merits of the motion , and it was dismissed as a result. 3. Corresponding Audio to follow with transcript https://docsend.com/view/5x5pvah6nem66srq 4 . Judgement entered by Judge Ott on 4-18-23, despite stating during the hearing on record, that she would not be hearing the merits of the motion at that time. Judgement entered 4-18-23 https://docsend.com/view/7ui4g3c2iaewec9v This was the SECOND time a judgement entered by The Presiding Judge of St. Louis County Courts that can easily be identified as fraudulent when compared to the audio and transcript of the hearing. She was recreating what happened in the case through her judgements for the purposes of concealing the truth, undermining my credibility, and engaging in the same psychologically, emotinally, and financially abusive tactics her collegue already was , to ensure this “problem” (the crime I caught them committing with factual evidence) would go away. After all- who would ever believe a judge would do something so blatantly fraudulent?! _____________________________________________________________________________________ Motion/Hearing/Judgement Related To Judge Green In The Ojeda vs. Ojeda Case (2nd case he picked up once he was already being accused of civil rights crime) 1. Petitioner’s Emergency Motions For Relief From Judgement or Order, Disqualification of Judge Green for Cause in Division 36, And Appointment of Retired Judge, The Honorable Mary Schroeder For Special Assignement. (filed 1-10-23) https://docsend.com/view/inidkjs2ny45r83p - Associated Exhibit Binder https://docsend.com/view/a4dtxxqi5sstn77v
Made with FlippingBook - PDF hosting