14
TURHAN ET AL .
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
17. Hemmilä V, Adamopoulos S, Karlsson O, Kumar A. Develop- ment of sustainable bio-adhesives for engineered wood panels – a review. RSCAdv . 2017;7(61):38604-38630. 18. Kumar R, Pizzi A. Environmental aspects of adhesives – emission of formaldehyde. In: Kumar RN, Pizzi A, eds. Adhe- sives for Wood and Lignocellulosic Materials . Wiley-Scrivener Publishing; 2019:293-312. 19. Dunky M. Adhesives in the wood industry. In: Pizzi A, Mittal KL, eds. Handbook of Adhesive Technology . CRC Press; 2017:511-574. 20. Frihart CR. Wood adhesion and adhesives. In: Rowell RM, ed. Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites . CRC Press; 2005:255-313. 21. Mantanis GI, Athanassiadou ET, Barbu MC, Wijnendaele K. Adhesive systems used in the European particleboard, MDF and OSB industries. Wood Mater Sci Eng . 2018;13(2):104-116. 22. Aydin I. Activation of wood surfaces for glue bonds by mechan- ical pre-treatment and its effects on some properties of veneer surfaces and plywood panels. Appl Surf Sci . 2004;233(1 – 4): 268-274. 23. Sakata I, Morita M, Tsuruta N, Morita K. Activation of wood surface by corona treatment to improve adhesive bonding. J Appl Polym Sci . 1993;49(7):1251-1258. 24. Kusnierek K, Woznicki T, Treu A. Quality control of wood treated with citric acid and sorbitol using a handheld Raman spectrometer. J Clean Prod . 2024;434:139925. 25. Piao C, Winandy JE, Shupe TF. From hydrophilicity to hydro- phobicity: a critical review: part I. wettability and surface behavior. Wood Fiber Sci . 2010;42:490-510. 26. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale . 2011;3(1):71-85. 27. Isogai A, Zhou Y. Diverse nanocelluloses prepared from TEMPO-oxidized wood cellulose fibers: nanonetworks, nanofi- bers, and nanocrystals. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci . 2019; 23(2):101-106. 28. Kaffashsaie E, Yousefi H, Nishino T, et al. Direct conversion of raw wood to TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym . 2021;262:117938. 29. Chen H, Chi K, Cao R, et al. Nitro-oxidation process for fabri- cation of efficient bioadsorbent from lignocellulosic biomass by combined liquid-gas phase treatment. Carbohydr Polym Tech- nol Appl . 2022;3:100219. 30. Sharma PR, Chattopadhyay A, Sharma SK, et al. Nanocellulose from spinifex as an effective adsorbent to remove cadmium (II) from water. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng . 2018;6(3):3279- 3290. 31. Sharma PR, Chattopadhyay A, Sharma SK, Hsiao BS. Efficient removal of UO22 + from water using carboxycellulose nanofi- bers prepared by the nitro-oxidation method. Ind Eng Chem Res . 2017;56(46):13885-13893. 32. Vozniuk ON, Blinov IA, Laskin BM, et al. Optimization of oxi- dation of cellulose by dinitrogen tetraoxide for industrial appli- cation. J Chem Technol Metall . 2022;57(6):1142-1150. 33. ISO E. 12460 – 5. Wood-Based Panels-Determination of Formal- dehyde Release — Part 5. Extraction Method (Called the Perfo- rator Method). 2015. 34. Quijano-Solis C, Yan N, Zhang SY. Effect of mixing conditions and initial fiber morphology on fiber dimensions after proces- sing. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf . 2009;40(4):351-358.
ORCID Emine A. Turhan
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5329-
1572
REFERENCES 1. Eckhard M, Ehrmann W, Hammerl D, et al. Fachkunde Holz- technik . Verlag Europa-Lehrmittel; 2003:19. 2. Regulation. Regulation E. No 528/2012 of the European Parlia- ment and of the Council of 22 May 2012 Concerning the Making Available on the Market and Use of Biocidal Products . Official Journal of the European Union; 2012:167. 3. Dunky M. Urea – formaldehyde (UF) adhesive resins for wood. Int J Adhes Adhes . 1998;18(2):95-107. 4. Troilo S, Besserer A, Rose C, Saker S, Soufflet L, Brosse N. Urea-formaldehyde resin removal in medium-density fiber- boards by steam explosion: developing nondestructive analyti- cal tools. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng . 2023;11(9):3603-3610. 5. Boran S, Usta M, Gümüs¸kaya E. Decreasing formaldehyde emission from medium density fiberboard panels produced by adding different amine compounds to urea formaldehyde resin. Int J Adhes Adhes . 2011;31(7):674-678. 6. Solt P, Konnerth J, Gindl-Altmutter W, et al. Technological performance of formaldehyde-free adhesive alternatives for particleboard industry. Int J Adhes Adhes . 2019;94:99-131. 7. Frihart CR, Chaffee TL, Wescott JM. Long-term formaldehyde emission potential from UF-and NAF-bonded particleboards. Polymers . 2020;12(8):1852. 8. Pan Z, Cathcart A, Wang D. Properties of particleboard bond with rice bran and polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate adhesives. Ind Crops Prod . 2006;23(1):40-45. 9. Lefkowitz D, Pechter E, Fitzsimmons K, et al. Isocyanates and work-related asthma: findings from California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Jersey, 1993 – 2008. Am J Ind Med . 2015; 58(11):1138-1149. 10. Musk AW, Peters JM, Wegman DH. Isocyanates and respira- tory disease: current status. AmJ IndMed . 1988;13(3):331-349. 11. Gonçalves D, Bordado JM, Marques AC, dos Galhano Santos R. Non-formaldehyde, bio-based adhesives for use in wood-based panel manufacturing industry — a review. Poly- mers . 2021;13(23):4086. 12. Chen H, Yan N. Application of western red cedar ( Thuja pli- cata ) tree bark as a functional filler in pMDI wood adhesives. Ind Crops Prod . 2018;113:1-9. 13. Pizzi A. Synthetic adhesives for wood panels: chemistry and technology. In: Mittal KL, ed. Progress in Adhesion and Adhe- sives . Wiley; 2015:85-123. 14. Grøstad K, Pedersen A. Emulsion polymer isocyanates as wood adhesive: a review. J Adhes Sci Technol . 2010;24(8 – 10):1357-1381. 15. Clau β S, Allenspach K, Gabriel J, Niemz P. Improving the ther- mal stability of one-component polyurethane adhesives by add- ing filler material. Wood Sci Technol . 2011;45:383-388. 16. Candan Z, Gardner DJ, Shaler SM. Dynamic mechanical ther- mal analysis (DMTA) of cellulose nanofibril/nanoclay/pMDI nanocomposites. Compos B Eng . 2016;90:126-132.
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker