56% agreed that the distinction between contractual and non-contractual termination payments should be removed with many suggesting that this would simplify the process. 80% agreed that removing the different tax and NIC treatment of different types of PILONs would help remove complexity for termination payments. 78% welcomed the suggestion that tax and NIC treatment be aligned, believing that alignment would make termination payments easier to administer and easier to understand. However there is a concern that aligning NIC with tax would incur more cost for employers. Only 36% believe that relief based on length of service would be easier for employers to administer, with most feeling this would reintroduce the complexity that these proposals are aiming to reduce. The majority of respondents believe that the new exemption threshold should be £30,000 in line with the existing threshold though several respondents feel the threshold should in fact be raised to £50,000. Just over a third of respondents believe that basing termination payments on length of service and redundancy will be easier for employees to understand. Conclusion Whilst members agree that the distinction between contractual and non-contractual termination payments should be removed, and that removing the different tax and NICs treatment of different types of PILONs would help remove complexity for termination payments, members are not convinced that the proposed exemption is any more straight forward, with many suggesting that one complexity is simply being replaced with another. Furthermore, if the NI treatment were to be aligned with the tax treatment this would simply incur more cost for the employer, and there is concern amongst some respondents that this proposal, far from being a move to remove complexity, is simply a method of raising more revenue. Recommendations The CIPP recommends that the government pursues its stated aim of simplification by removing the differentiation between contractual and non-contractual termination payments, and aligning the tax and NIC treatment of these payments. However to ensure that any reforms are clearly understood and easy to administer, the government should work with all stakeholder groups to ensure that the reforms are supported by clear, unambiguous guidance which is available to both employers, employees and their representatives well in advance of the introduction of any changes.
The full consultation response is available to view through the news link below.
CIPP response to the consultation on simplifying the tax and NIC treatment of termination payments
Up to date details of all consultations and associated surveys and responses can be found under Membership/My CIPP/ Policy Think Tank on the CIPP website.
What payroll information to report to HMRC 20 October 2015
HMRC has updated their late reporting guidance detailing what payroll information needs to be reported.
If you are paying employees through PAYE, find out what to put in your Full Payment Submission (FPS) and Employer Payment Summary (EPS).
CIPP survey on treatment of tips and gratuities 28 October 2015
Concerns have been raised about the treatment of tips, gratuities, cover and service charge payments in the hospitality sector, particularly in relation to the percentage of each payment that goes directly to the employer.
The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills has published a call for evidence to gather evidence on the prevalence of different practices in relation to tipping – including admin charge deductions, the use of pooling practices and charges falling to workers in relation to their sales. The government is also seeking evidence on the impact of these different practices on employers and workers. In particular, they are seeking views on the role for government in ensuring greater transparency and limiting the amount an employer can keep.
CIPP Policy News Journal
25/04/2016, Page 288 of 453
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker