Cellulose (2020) 27:6149–6162
6161
Chinga-Carrasco G (2011) Cellulose fibres, nanofibrils, and microfibrils: the morphological sequence of MFC compo- nents from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:417 Courchene CE, Peter GF, Litvay J (2006) Cellulose microfibril angle as a determinant of paper strength and hygroexpan- sivity in Pinus Taeda L. Wood Fiber Sci 38(1):112–120 Desmaisons J, Boutonnet E, Rueff M, Dufresne A, Bras J (2017) A new quality index for benchmarking of different cellu- lose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 174:318–329 Duchesne I, Hult E, Molin U, Daniel G, Iversen T, Lennholm H (2001) The influence of hemicellulose on fibril aggregation of kraft pulp fibres as revealed by FE-SEM and CP/MAS 13C-NMR. Cellulose 8(2):103–111 Ebringerova´ A (2005) Structural Diversity and Application Potential of Hemicelluloses. Macromol Symp 232(1):1–12 El-Hosseiny F, Page DH (1975) The mechanical properties of single wood pulp fibres: Theories of strength. J Fiber Sci Technol 8(1):21–31 Fengel D, Wegener G (1983) Wood—chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. De Gruyter Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci: Appl Polym Symp 37:797–813 Horn RA (1974) Morphology of pulp fiber from softwoods and influence on paper strength. Research Paper FPL 242, Forest Product Laboratory, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture Horn RA (1978) Morphology of pulp fiber from hardwoods and influence on paper strength. Research Paper FPL 312, Forest Product Laboratory, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture Hult E-L, Larsson PT, Iversen T (2001) Cellulose fibril aggre- gation—an inherent property of kraft pulps. Polymer 42(8):3309–3314 Husband JC, Svending P, Skuse DR, Motsi T, Likitalo M, Coles A, Fiberlean Technologies Ltd. (2015) Paper filler com- position. U.S. Pat. US9127405B2 Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H (2008) The Effect of Hemicelluloses on Wood Pulp Nanofibrillation and Nanofiber Network Characteristics. Biomacromol 9(3):1022–1026 Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y, Oksman K, Dufresne A, Hamzeh Y, Davoodi R (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructures cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22(2):935–969 Joutsimo O, Wathe´n R, Tamminen T (2005) Effects of fiber deformations on pulp sheet properties and fiber strength. Paperi Ja Puu/Paper and Timber 87(6) Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44(22):3358–3393 Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstro¨m T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature- based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466 Lahtinen P, Liukkonen S, Pere J, Sneck A, Kangas H (2014) A Comparative Study of Fibrillated Fibers from Different Mechanical and Chemical Pulps. BioResources 9(2):2115–2127 Liitia¨ T, Maunu SL, Hortling B, Tamminen T, Pekkala O, Varhimo A (2003) Cellulose crystallinity and ordering of
absence of hemicellulose was required for the model to fit the data. In order to make this model useful, the zero-span tensile strength of the initial fibres was used as a proxy for the MFC length, since it appears that the frequency of flaws in the fibril structures that is represented by the zero-span tensile strength affects the particle lengths when MFC is produced. This replacement resulted in a weaker fit, but still a substantial improvement over hemicellulose content alone. From this work, it is shown that measurements of the hemicellulose content and zero-span tensile strength of pulp fibres can be used for a reasonably accurate prediction of the resultant MFC tensile strength, providing a facile method to aid in the selection of cellulose sources for use as a feedstock for microfib- rillated cellulose production.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest conflict of interest.
The authors declare that they have no
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
References
Alila S, Besbes I, Vilar MR, Mutje´ P, Boufi S (2013) Non- woody plants as raw materials for production of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC): a comparative study. Ind Crop Prod 41:250–259 Arola S, Malha JM, Laaksonen P, Lille M, Linder MB (2013) The role of hemicellulose in nanofibrillated cellulose net- works. Soft Matter 9:1319–1326 Bolam FM (1965) Stuff preparation for paper and paperboard making: monographs on paperboard and papermaking. Pergamon Chaker A, Alila S, Mutje´ P, Vilar MR, Boufi S (2013) Key role of the hemicellulose content and the cell morphology on the nanofibrillation effectiveness of cellulose pulps. Cel- lulose 20(6):2863–2875
123
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter maker