Land 2023 , 12 , 305
18of 20
16. Johnson, F.X.; Bessonova, E. Forest Resources are at the Heart of the EU’s Bioeconomy Strategy. How Can they Be Used Sustainably? Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2021; Available online: https://www.sei.org/perspectives/forests-eu- bioeconomy/ (accessed on 10 December 2022). 17. Lainez, M.; Gonz á lez, J.M.; Aguilar, A.; Vela, C. Spanish strategy on bioeconomy: Towards a knowledge based sustainable innovation. New Biotechnol. 2018 , 40 , 87–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 18. Stadler, T.; Chauvet, J.M. New innovative ecosystems in France to develop the Bioeconomy. New Biotechnol. 2018 , 40 , 113–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 19. Refsgaard, K.; Kull, M.; Slätmo, E.; Meijer, M.W. Bioeconomy—A driver for regional development in the Nordic countries. New Biotechnol. 2021 , 60 , 130–137. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 20. New EU Forest Strategy for 2030 ; Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; COM(2021) 572 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2021; p. 27. 21. Wolfslehner, B.; Prokofieva, I.; Mavsar, R. Non-Wood Forest Products in Europe: Seeing the Forest around the Trees. What Science Can TellUs 10 ; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2019; p. 114. 22. Weiss, G.; Emery, M.R.; Corradini, J.; Živojinovic´, I. New Values of Non-Wood Forest Products. Forests 2020 , 11 , 165. [CrossRef] 23. Weiss, G.; Ludvig, A.; Asamer-Handler, M.; Fischer, C.; Vacik, H.; Živojinovic´, I. Rendering NWFPs innovative. In Non-Wood Forest Products in Europe: Seeing the Forest around the Trees. What Science Can Tell Us 10 ; Wolfslehner, B., Prokofieva, I., Mavsar, R., Eds.; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2019; pp. 77–97. 24. Gorizz, E. NWFPs in a bioeconomy spectrum: Opening opportunities for cross sectoral links. In Non-Wood Forest Products in Europe: Seeing the Forest around the Trees. What Science Can Tell Us 10 ; Wolfslehner, B., Ed.; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2019; pp. 100–103. 25. Prokofieva, I.; Bouriaud, L.; Buttoud-Kouplevatskaya, I.; Corradini, G.; G ó rriz, E.; Nichiforel, L. The Role of Institutions in NTFP Development: Current State and Historical Changes. Project Deliverable D4.1. StarTree Project (EU Project 311919). 2014. Available online: https://www.star-tree.eu/results/deliverables.html#wp-4 (accessed on 3 July 2021). 26. Prokofieva, I.; Lovric, M.; Pettenella, D.; Weiß, G.; Wolfslehner, B.; Wong, J. What is the Potential Contribution of Non-Wood Forest Products to the European Forest-Based Bioeconomy? What Science Can Tell Us 8 ; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2017; pp. 132–140. 27. Purwestri, R.C.; H á jek, M.; Šodkov á , M.; Jarsk ý , V. How Are Wood and Non-Wood Forest Products Utilized in the Czech Republic? A Preliminary Assessment of a Nationwide Survey on the Bioeconomy. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 566. [CrossRef] 28. Weiss, G.; Ludvig, A.; Živojinovic´, I. Four decades of innovation research in forestry and the forest-based industries—A systematic literature review. For. Policy Econ. 2020 , 120 , 102288. [CrossRef] 29. Pel, B.; Achten, W. Transitioning into Circular Economy; appreciating the little steps of system innovation. In Transitioning to a Circular Economy. Changing Business Models and Business Ecosystems ; Mansy, J., Verga, G.C., Pel, B., Messagie, M., Lebeau, P., Achten, W., Khan, A.Z., Macharis, C., Eds.; ASP: Brussels, Belgium, 2022; pp. 49–73. 30. The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda, Main Findings, and Policy Conclusions ; OECD: Paris, France, 2009; p. 323. [CrossRef] 31. Aguilar, A.; Wohlgemuth, R.; Twardowski, T. Perspectives on bioeconomy. N. Biotechnol. 2018 , 40 , 181–184. [CrossRef] 32. Purkus, A.; Hagemann, N.; Bedtke, N.; Gawel, E. Towards a sustainable innovation system for the German wood-based bioeconomy: Implications for policy design. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 172 , 3955–3968. [CrossRef] 33. Bröring, S.; Laibach, N.; Wustmans, M. Innovation types in the bioeconomy. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 266 , 121939. [CrossRef] 34. Giurca, A.; Späth, P. A forest-based bioeconomy for Germany? Strengths, weaknesses and policy options for lignocellulosic biorefineries. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 153 , 51–62. [CrossRef] 35. Edquist, C. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. In Oxford Handbook of Innovation ; Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson, R.R., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 181–208. 36. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Oslo Manual , 3rd ed.; OECD: Paris, France, 2005. 37. Polman, N.; Slee, W.; Kluv á nkov á , T.; Dijkshoorn, M.; Nijnik, M.; Gezik, V.; Soma, K. Classification of Social Innovations for Marginalized Rural Areas, Report D2.1. Social Innovation in Marginalised Rural Areas Project (SIMRA). 2017, 32p. Available online: http://www.simra-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/D2.1-Classification-of-SI-for-MRAs-in-the-target-region. pdf (accessed on 5 December 2022). 38. Weiss, G.; Ollonqvist, P.; Slee, B. How to Support Innovations in the Forest Sector: Summary and Conclusions. In Innovation in Forestry: Territorial and Value Chain Relationships ; Weiss, G., Pettenella, D., Ollonqvist, P., Slee, B., Eds.; CABI International: Oxfordshire, UK, 2011; pp. 303–319. ISBN 978-1-84593-689-1. 39. Howaldt, J.; Knopp, R. Shaping social innovation by social research. In Challenge Social Innovation. Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship and Civil Society ; Franz, H.W., Hochgerner, J., Howaldt, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 43–55. 40. Terms and Definitions. Forest Resource Assessment ; Working Paper 180; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015; Available online: http://www.fao. org/docrep/017/ap862e/ap862e00.pdf (accessed on 22 December 2022). 41. Berg, B.L. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 4th ed.; Allyn & Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 2001; p. 304.
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online