Fibers 2025 , 13 , 23
18of 22
8. Garcia, R.; Calvez, I.; Koubaa, A.; Landry, V.; Cloutier, A. Sustainability, circularity, and innovation in wood-based panel manufacturing in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges. Curr. For. Rep. 2024 , 2024 , 10420–10441. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 9. FAO. FAOSTAT: Forestry Production and Trade. 2024. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO (accessed on 28 December 2024). 10. Forest Research. Forestry Statistics 2023 ; Forest Research: Roslin, UK, 2023. Available online: https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/ tools-and-resources/statistics/publications/forestry-statistics/forestry-statistics-2023/ (accessed on 9 December 2024). 11. Spear, M. The benefits of circular economy approaches in the wood panels industry on the magnitude of harvested wood products (HWP) storage. In Proceedings of the International Panel Products Symposium (IPPS 2023), Llandudno, UK, 3–4 October 2023; pp. 23–40. 12. Forster, E.J.; Healey, J.R.; Newman, G.; Styles, D. Circular wood use can accelerate global decarbonisation but requires cross- sectoral coordination. Nat. Commun. 2023 , 14 , 6766. [CrossRef] 13. WRAP. Wood Waste Market in the UK, Summary Report, Project Code MKN022 ; Poyry Forest Industry Consulting Ltd.: Oakville, ON, Canada; Oxford Economics Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2009; p. 37. 14. WRA. Wood Recyclers’ Association Waste Wood Market Statistics 2007. 2008. Available online: http://www.woodrecyclers.org (accessed on 21 February 2011). 15. WRA. Over 97% of UK Waste Wood Processed in 2023. 2024. Available online: https://woodrecyclers.org/over-97-of-uk-waste- wood-processed-in-2023/ (accessed on 9 December 2024). 16. Sirkin, T.; Houten, M.T. The cascade chain: A theory and tool for achieving resource sustainability with applications in product design. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1994 , 10 , 213–277. [CrossRef] 17. UNECE FAO. Circularity Concepts in Forest-Based Industries. Geneva Timber and Forest Study Paper 49. 2021. Available online: https://unece.org/info/Forests/pub/367742 (accessed on 1 August 2024). 18. Yang, M.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Msigwa, G.; Osman, A.I.; Fawzy, S.; Rooney, D.W.; Yap, P.-S. Circular economy strategies for combatting climate change and other environmental issues. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023 , 21 , 55–80. [CrossRef] 19. EPF. EPF Applauds Cascading Use of Wood with EU Legislation. 2023. Available online: https://europanels.org/press-release- epf-applauds-cascading-use-of-wood-in-eu-legislation/ (accessed on 28 December 2024). 20. Winder, G.M.; Bobar, A. Responses to stimulate substitution and cascade use of wood within a wood use system: Experience from Bavaria, Germany. Appl. Geogr. 2018 , 90 , 350–359. [CrossRef] 21. FAO. Global Forest Sector Outlook 2050: Assessing Future Demand and Sources of Timber for a Sustainable Economy. 2022. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/9f646b14-28d2-496e-9728-0b1c281339b5/content (accessed on 20 December 2024). 22. Birdsey, R.; Duffy, P.; Smyth, C.; Kutz, W.; Dugan, A.J.; Houghton, R. Climate, economic and environmental impacts of producing wood for bioenergy. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018 , 13 , 050201. [CrossRef] 23. Lee, H.; Brown, C.; Seo, B.; Holman, I.; Audsley, E.; Cojocaru, G.; Rounsvell, M. Implementing land-based mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement in Europe requires food system transformation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019 , 14 , 104009. [CrossRef] 24. Soimakallio, S.; Kalliokoski, T.; Lehtonen, A.; Salminen, O. On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2021 , 26 , 4. [CrossRef] 25. Hope, E.; Gagnon, B.; Avdic, V. Assessment of the impact of climate change policies on the market for forest industrial residues. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 1787. [CrossRef] 26. Auer, V.; Rauch, P. Wood supply chain risks and risk mitigation strategies: A systematic review focusing on the Northern Hemisphere. Biomass Bioenergy 2021 , 148 , 10601. [CrossRef] 27. Ormondroyd, G.O.; Spear, M.J.; Skinner, C. The opportunities and challenges for re-use and recycling of timber and wood products within the construction sector. In Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-Based Bioproducts ; Kutnar, A., Muthu, S.S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 45–104. 28. Nguyen, D.L.; Luedtke, J.; Nopens, M.; Krause, A. Production of wood-based panel from recycled wood resource: A literature review. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2023 , 81 , 557–570. [CrossRef] 29. DEFRA. Wood Waste Landfill Restrictions in England: Call for Evidence ; DEFRA: London, UK, 2013. 30. Gov.uk. Official Statistics on Waste. 2024. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-waste-data/uk- statistics-on-waste (accessed on 28 December 2024). 31. PAS 111:2012 ; Specification for the Requirements and Test Methods for Processing Waste Wood. British Standards Institute: London, UK, 2012. 32. WRAP. The Business Case for Wood Waste Collection Hubs ; WRAP: London, UK, 2012. 33. WRA. WRA Grades of Waste Wood. 2023. Available online: https://woodrecyclers.org/wp-content/uploads/WRA-Grades-of- Waste-Wood.pdf (accessed on 20 December 2024).
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator