PAPERmaking! Vol8 Nr2 2022

Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 2619

16of 16

54. Mayr, M.; Eckhart, R.; Sumerskiy, I.; Potthast, A.; Rosenau, T.; Schoeggl, J.P.; Posch, A.; Timmel, T. Flippr—An industrial research project in Austria. Tappi J. 2015 , 14 , 209–213. [CrossRef] 55. Byun, D.-H. The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model. Inf. Manag. 2001 , 38 , 289–297. [CrossRef] 56. Hischier, R.; Althaus, H.; Werner, F. Developments in wood and packaging materials life cycle inventories in ecoinvent. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2005 , 10 , 50–58. [CrossRef] 57. Mackenzie, S.G.; Leinonen, I.; Kyriazakis, I. The need for co-product allocation in the life cycle assessment of agricultural systems—Is “biophysical” allocation progress? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2017 , 22 , 128–137. [CrossRef] 58. Malmodin, J.; Oliv, L.; Bergmark, P. Life cycle assessment of third generation (3G) wireless telecommunication systems at ericsson. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, 11–15 December 2001; pp. 328–334. [CrossRef] 59. Zetterholm, J.; Bryngemark, E.; Ahlström, J.; Söderholm, P.; Harvey, S.; Wetterlund, E. Economic Evaluation of Large-Scale Biorefinery Deployment: A Framework Integrating Dynamic Biomass Market and Techno-Economic Models. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 7126. [CrossRef] 60. Li, X.; Chen, L.; Ding, X. Allocation Methodology of Process-Level Carbon Footprint Calculation in Textile and Apparel Products. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 4471. [CrossRef] 61. Musonda, F.; Millinger, M.; Thrän, D. Greenhouse Gas Abatement Potentials and Economics of Selected Biochemicals in Germany. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 2230. [CrossRef] 62. Schrijvers, D.; Loubet, P.; Sonnemann, G. Archetypes of Goal and Scope Definitions for Consistent Allocation in LCA. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 5587. [CrossRef] 63. Tsalidis, G.A.; Korevaar, G. From the allocation debate to a substitution paradox in waste bioenergy life cycle assessment studies. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020 , 25 , 181–187. [CrossRef] 64. Lettner, M.; Hesser, F. Asking instead of telling-recommendations for developing life cycle assessment within technical r&d projects, Sustainable Production. In Progress in Life Cycle Assessment 2019 ; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 173–188. [CrossRef] 65. Keil, M.; Depledge, G.; Rai, A. Escalation: The role of problem recognition and cognitive bias. Decis. Sci. 2007 , 38 , 391–421. [CrossRef] 66. Sarkis, J.; Zhu, Q.; Lai, K.-H. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011 , 130 , 1–15. [CrossRef] 67. Reynolds, T.J.; Phillips, J.M. A review and comparative analysis of laddering research methods. Rev. Mark. Res. 2009 , 5 , 130–174. [CrossRef] 68. Subramanian, R.; Talbot, B.; Gupta, S. An Approach to Integrating Environmental Considerations Within Managerial Decision- Making. J. Ind. Ecol. 2010 , 14 , 378–398. [CrossRef]

Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker