PAPERmaking! Vol6 Nr1 2020

bioresources. com

PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Main Findings

Figure 3 shows the relative contributions of the four stages to each subsystem and the impact category. The contributions of the raw materials supply ranged from 25.0% for the EQ to 43.6% for HH, while the contribution of the energy consumption stage ranged from 21.3% for HH to 41.1% for the EQ. The transportation stage contributed 21.3% for R and 31.3% for the EQ, and the HWC wardrobe manufacturing stage contributed 1.2% for R to 3.8% for HH. It was found that the subsystems for the raw materials supply and energy consumption were responsible for all of the damage categories, and HWC wardrobe manufacturing had the lowest contribution to the environmental impact. This was consistent with the results of Yuan and Guo (2017).

Fig. 3. Relative contributions to the three main damage categories for the four stages of each subsystem

Fig. 4. Relative contributions to the sub-damage categories for the four stages of each subsystem

2747

Li et al . (2019 ). “Wardrobe case study in China,” B io R esources 14(2), 2740-2758.

Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software