14
A. Toppinen et al. / Futures 88 (2017) 1 – 14
Kivimaa, P., & Kautto, P. (2010). Making or breaking environmental innovation? Technological change and innovation markets in the pulp and paper industry. Management Research Review , 33 (4), 289 – 305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01409171011030426. Kleinschmit, D., Lindstad, B., Jellesmark Thorsen, B., Toppinen, A., Roos, A., & Baardsen, S. (2014). Shades of green: Social science view on forest sector in bioeconomy. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (4), 402 – 410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.921722. Koskela, M. (2015). Measuring eco-ef fi ciency in the Finnish forest industry using public data. Journal of Cleaner Production , 98 , 316 – 327. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.042. Kozak, A. (2013). What now, [82_TD$DIFF] Mr. Jones? Some thoughts about today ’ s forest sector and tomorrow ’ s great leap forward. In E. Hansen, R. Panwar, & R. Vlosky (Eds.), The global forest sector: Changes, Practices, and prospects , New York: Taylor and Francis Group. Kuusi, O. (1999). Expertise in the future use of generic technologies Epistemic and Methodological Considerations Concerning Delphi Studies . Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research VATT-Reseach Reports 59. http://www.vatt. fi . Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 73 (5), 467 – 482. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002. Lindahl, K. B., & Westholm, E. (2012). Future forests: Perceptions and strategies of key actors. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research , 27 (2),154 – 163. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2011.635073. Loorbach, D., & Wijsman, K. (2013). Business transition management: Exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production , 45 , 20 – 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.002. McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013). The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability , 5 , 2589 – 2608. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5062589. Näyhä, A., & Pesonen, H.-L. (2012). Diffusion of forest biore fi neries in Scandinavia and North America. Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 79 (6),1111 – 1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.006. Näyhä, A., & Pesonen, H.-L. (2014). Strategic change in the forest industry towards the biore fi ning business. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 81 (1), 259 – 271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.04.014. Näyhä, A., Hetemäki, L., & Stern, T. (2014). New products outlook. In L. Hetemäki (Ed.), Future of the European forest based sector: Structural changes towards bioeconomy (pp. 43 – 54).EFI What science can tell us 6. Näyhä, A., Pelli, P., & Hetemäki, L. (2015). Services in the forest sector unexplored futures. Foresight , 17 (4), 378 – 398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/FS-08-2013- 0034. Ojala, J., Lamberg, J., Ahola, A., & Melander, A. (2007). The ephemera of success: Strategy, structure and performance in the forestry industries. In J. Lamberg, J. Näsi, J. Ojala, & P. Sajasalo (Eds.), The evolution of competitive strategies in global forest industries: Comparative perspectives , World forests: Dordrecht: Springer. Olsmats, C., & Kaivo-oja, J. (2014). European packaging industry foresight study identifying global drivers and driven packaging industry implications of the global magatrends. European Journal of Futures Research , 2 , 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0039-4. Pätäri, S. (2009). On value creation at an industrial intersection – Bioenergy in the forest and energy sectors . Lappeenranta University of Technology [PhD diss.]. Pätäri, S. (2010). Industry- and company-level factors in fl uencing the development of the forest energy business – Insights from a Delphi Study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 7 (1), 94 – 109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.004. Pätäri, S., Tuppura, A., Toppinen, A., & Korhonen, J. (2016). Global sustainability megaforces in shaping the future of the European pulp and paper industry towards a bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics 66 , 38 – 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.009. Peltoniemi, M. (2013). Mechanisms of capability evolution in the Finnish forest industry cluster. Journal of Forest Economics , 19 (2), 190 – 205. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jfe.2013.02.001. Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal , 7 (6), 485 – 501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070602. Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The blinders of dominant logic. Long Range Planning , 37 (2), 171 – 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.01.010. Ribeiro, B. E., & Quintanilla, M. A. (2015). Transitions in biofuel technologies: An appraisal of the social impacts of cellulosic ethanol using the Delphi method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 92 , 53 – 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.006. Roos, A., Stendal, M., et al. (2016). [ 85_TD$DIFF] The merging bio-economy and the forest sector. Ch. 10. In R. Panwar (Ed.), [86_TD$DIFF] Forests, business and sustainability. Earthscan (pp. 179 – 201).New York: Routledge. Sabatier, V., Craig-Kennard, A., & Mangematin, V. (2012). When technological discontinuities and disruptive business models challenge dominant industry logics: Insights from the drugs industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 79 , 949 – 962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.007. Sisto, R., van Vliet, M., & Prosperi, M. (2016). Puzzling stakeholder views for long-term planning in the bio-economy: A back-casting application. Futures , 76 , 42 – 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.04.002. Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M., & McCormick, K. (2013). Strategies and policies for the bioeconmy and bio-based economy: An analysis of of fi cial national approaches. Sustainability , 5 , 2751 – 2769. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5062751. Steinert, M. (2009). A dissensus based online Delphi approach: An explorative research tool. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 76 (3), 291 – 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.006. Tapio, P. (2002). Disaggregative policy Delphi: Using cluster analysis as a tool for systematic scenario formation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 70 (1), 83 – 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00177-9. Theworld ’ s leading forest cluster 2030 (2010). Research strategy of Finnish [87_TD$DIFF] Forest Industries Federation . . Toppinen, A., Wan, M., & Lähtinen, K. (2013). Strategic orientations in the global forest sector. In E. Hansen, R. Panwar, & R. Vlosky (Eds.), The global forest sector: Changes, [88_TD$DIFF] practices, and prospects , New York: Taylor and Francis Group. Turoff, M. (1975). The policy delphi. In H. A. Linstone, & M. Turoff (Eds.), The [89_TD$DIFF] Delphi Method Techniques and applications (pp. 80 – 96).Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley. Uronen, T. (2010). On the transformation processes of the global pulp and paper industry and their implications for corporate strategies A European perspective . Helsinki University of Technology [PhD diss]. Zhang, Y., Toppinen, A., & Uusivuori, J. (2014). Internationalization of the forest industry: A synthesis of the literature and implications for the future research. Forest Policy and Economics 38 (1), 8 – 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.017. Zollo, M., Cennamo, C., & Neuman, M. (2013). Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization & Environment , 26 , 241 – 259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086026613496433.
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker