Citation: Rajkumar K (2016) $Q(YDOXDWLRQRI%LRORJLFDO$SSURDFKIRUWKH(IÀXHQW7UHDWPHQWRI3DSHU%RDUGV,QGXVWU\$Q(FRQRPLF3HUVSHFWLYH J %LRUHPHGLDW%LRGHJUDG 366 GRL 366
Page 4 of 13
were analyzed using analytical grade chemicals and all the parameters were analyzed using the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater of the American Public Health Association (APHA, 1995) and are approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). In solid waste sample analyses were performed in Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) quanta FEG 250 FEI Company, Czech Republic and Perkin Elmer optima 5300DV ICP-OES.
were analyzed in order to see the fluctuations in loadings during board machine production process. The effluent was characterized for various physicochemical parameters like: pH, Temperature, TSS, TDS, Chloride, Sulphate, BOD, COD and Oil and Grease in a process step wise showed in Table 2. ETP performance This analysis will give us a brief idea of ETP performance and efficiency of process to pollution load handle daily by the industrial persons. The wastewater was collected over a period of study and the results were depicted in Figures 3-11. Temperature: Temperature was greatly affects the activity of
Results and Discussion Wastewater characteristics
Pollution loading of the paper board industrial wastewater depends significantly on the raw material used. Wastewater characteristics
30
29
º
28
27
26
25
1 3 5 7 9 1113151719212325272931 Days
Figure 3: Variation in the process temperature for the period of study.
6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8
Inlet pH Oultet pH
1 3 5 7 9 1113151719212325272931 Days
Figure 4: Variation in the S+SUR¿OHLQLQÀXHQWDQGWUHDWHGHIÀXHQWIRUWKH period of study.
J Bioremediat Biodegrad ISSN: 2155-6199 JBRBD, an open access journal
Volume 7 • Issue 5 • 1000366
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Creator