Citation: Rajkumar K (2016) $Q(YDOXDWLRQRI%LRORJLFDO$SSURDFKIRUWKH(IÀXHQW7UHDWPHQWRI3DSHU%RDUGV,QGXVWU\$Q(FRQRPLF3HUVSHFWLYH J %LRUHPHGLDW%LRGHJUDG 366 GRL 366
Page 12 of 13
Primary &ODUL¿HU
Aeration Tank - I
Secondary &ODUL¿HU$
Aeration Tank - II
Secondary &ODUL¿HU%
Tertiary &ODUL¿HU
Treated (IÀXHQW
Equalization
63&% stranded
S No Parameters Units
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S+
7.19 756 1599
7.11 152 1612
7.22 5036 1708
7.38
7.23 3980 1893
7.56
7.42
7.5
6.5-8.0
TSS 7'6
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
16
12
16
12
100
1843
1878
1891
1946
2100 1000 1000
Chloride Sulphate
734 469 225 932
783 490
910 585
881 656
861 624
812 651
822 611
812 626
%2' &2'
80
1800 4480
4
1100 3200
10 56
9
9
30
264
88
56
56
250
2LODQG Grease
8
mg/L
18
12
24
4*
22
4*
4*
4*
10
* Below detectable limit
Table 3: Characteristics of paper board industry wastewater and ETP stage wise pollutants reduction.
Proximate analysis
Sludge
6RGLXP 2'%
&KORULGH 2'% &DORUL¿F9DOXH N&DONJ
Volatile Mater (%)
Fixed Carbon (%)
Moisture (%)
Ash (%)
Primary and secondary FODUL¿HU
61.7
31.7
6.4
0.2
0.9
0.3
1879
* 2QGU\EDVH
Table 4: 3UR[LPDWHDQDO\VLVRISDSHUERDUGLQGXVWU\(73VOXGJH
4. $OL06UHHNULVKQDQ75 $TXDWLFWR[LFLW\IURPSXOSDQG paper mill HIÀXHQWVDUHYLHZ$GY(QYLURQ5HV . 5. Thompson G, Swain J, KayM, Forster CF (2001) The treatment of pulp and SDSHUPLOOHIÀXHQWDUHYLHZ%LRUHVRXUFH7HFKQRORJ\ 6. 3RNKUHO'9LUDUDJKDYDQ7 7UHDWPHQWRISXOSDQGSDSHUPLOOZDVWHZDWHU ±DUHYLHZ6FLHQFHRIWKH7RWDO(QYLURQPHQW 7. :DQJ<36PLWK5 :DVWHZDWHUPLQLPL]DWLRQ&KHP(QJ6FL -1006. 8. .XR:&6PLWK5 'HVLJQLQJIRUWKHLQWHUDFWLRQVEHWZHHQZDWHUXVHDQG HIÀXHQWWUHDWPHQW&KHPLFDO(QJLQHHULQJ5HVHDUFKDQG'HVLJQ 9. $OPDWR0(VSXQD$3XLJMDQHU/ 2SWLPL]DWLRQRIZDWHUXVHLQEDWFK process industries. Comput Chem Eng 23: 1427-1437. 10. 'XQQ5):HQ]HO+ 3URFHVVLQWHJUDWLRQGHVLJQPHWKRGVIRUZDWHU FRQVHUYDWLRQ DQG ZDVWHZDWHU UHGXFWLRQ LQ LQGXVWU\ 3DUW 'HVLJQ IRU VLQJOH contaminants. Clean Prod Processes 3: 307-318. 11. Rajkumar K, Muthukumar M, Sivakumar R (2010) Novel approach for the WUHDWPHQWDQGUHF\FOHRIZDVWHZDWHUIURPVR\DHGLEOHRLOUH¿QHU\LQGXVWU\²$Q economic perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54: 752-758. 12. +DOODOH1)UDVHU'0 &DSLWDOFRVWWDUJHWVIRUPDVVH[FKDQJHQHWZRUNV $VSHFLDOFDVHZDWHUPLQLPL]DWLRQ&KHPLFDO(QJLQHHULQJ6FLHQFHV 313. 13. -RGLFNH*)LVFKHU8+XQJHUEXKOHU. :DVWHZDWHUUHXVHDQHZ approach to screen for designs with minimal total costs. Comput Chem Eng 25: 203-215. 14. 3DUWKDVDUDWK\* 0LQLPL]DWLRQRIFRVWRIUHF\FOLQJLQFKHPLFDOSURFHVVHV Chem Eng J 81: 137-151. 15. .RSSRO$35%DJDMHZLF]0-'HULFNV%-6DYHOVNL0- 2Q]HURZDWHU discharge solutions in the process industry. Adv Environ Res 8: 151-171. 16. Brahmani PSR, Mugeraya G, Sandhyavali MS (2012) Effect of media FRQVWLWXHQWV RQ PLFURELDO HQ]\PH DFWLYLW\ ,QWHU - 3KUPD &KHP %LROR 6FL 236-241. 17. -LYHQGUD :DWHUSROOXWLRQFRQWUROLQSXOSDQGSDSHULQGXVWU\±DJOREDO UHYLHZ:DWHUSROOXWLRQPDQDJHPHQW$3+SXEOLVKLQJFRRSHUDWLRQ1HZ'HOKL India pp: 13-47. 18. Pepper IL, Gerba CP, Brusseau ML (1996) Pollution science. Carolina: Academic. 19. $WODV50 +DQGERRNRIPLFURELRORJLFDOPHGLD)ORULGD86$ 20. .XPDU9'KDOO3.XPDU53UDNDVK6LQJK<.XPDU$ %LRUHPHGLDWLRQ RI DJUREDVHG SXOS PLOO HIÀXHQW E\ PLFURELDO FRQVRUWLXP FRPSULVLQJ DXWRFKWKRQRXVEDFWHULD6FLHQWL¿F:RUOG-RXUQDOSS .
S No
Metals
Mass
&RQFHQWUDWLRQ PJNJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Be Na Mg
9
0.0002 8.7333 9.7866 61.8084 1.2967 0.1594 0.4242 11.5066 0.1526 0.3272 0.4698 0.0032 0.0003 0.0408 0.0048
23 24 27 39 52 55 57 60 63 66 75 82 98
Al
K
Cr
Mn Fe
Ni
10 11 12 13 14 15
Cu =Q As Se Mo Cd Pd
111 208
16 0.1118 Table 5: Macro and micro elements of paper board industry ETP sludge. the treatment cost. The observed result indicate that further reduction in the operation cost for energy can contribute strongly to reduced the total treatment cost. Acknowledgements 7KHDXWKRU'U.5WKDQNIXOWR7KLUX2$UXPXJDVDP\&KDLUPDQ RI6HQWKLO *URXSRI&RPSDQLHV6UL$6HQWKLONXPDU0DQDJLQJ'LUHFWRU6HQWKLO3DSHUVDQG %RDUGV 3 /LPLWHG0U719HWULYHO'LUHFWRUDQG0U/DNVKPDQDQ3LOODL8QLW +HDGRI6HQWKLO3DSHUVDQG%RDUGV 3 /LPLWHG7DPLO1DGX,QGLDIRULQVSLUDWLRQ References 1. $VKUD¿2<HUXVKDOPL/+DJKLJKDW) :DVWHZDWHUWUHDWPHQWLQWKH pulp-and-paper industry: A review of treatment processes and the associated greenhouse gas emission. J Envirol Manage 158: 146-157. 2. Sevimli MF (2005) Post-treatment of pulp and paper industry wastewater by DGYDQFHGR[LGDWLRQSURFHVVHV2]RQH6FLHQFHDQG(QJLQHHULQJ 3. Mathur RM, Panwar S, Gupta MK, Endlay N, Kukarni AG (2004) Agro-based pulp and paper mills: environmental status, issues and challenges and the role RI&HQWUDO3XOSDQG3DSHU5HVHDUFK,QVWLWXWH,Q7HZDUL3. (GV /LTXLGDVVHW SURFHHGLQJVRIWKH,QGR(8ZRUNVKRSRQSURPRWLQJ(I¿FLHQW:DWHU8VHLQ$JUR %DVHG,QGXVWULHV7(5,3UHVV1HZ'HOKL,QGLDSS
J Bioremediat Biodegrad ISSN: 2155-6199 JBRBD, an open access journal
Volume 7 • Issue 5 • 1000366
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Creator