Cut Back Results Results varied among varieties, though most demonstrated a positive long-term cut back response: • In general, they developed a denser, more compact habit and maintained a more uniform appearance later in the trial compared with untreated controls. • They also displayed extended summer performance, suggesting that a hard cut back may be an effective strategy for freshening vigorous varieties and improving finished plant quality.
The primary disadvantage of the cut back treatment was a temporary 1-2 week delay in flowering following cut back, which varied by variety.
Helianthus Sunfinity® Double Yellow
Coleus, Gomphrena, Helianthus, and Ipomoea recovered the quickest, with flowering and overall development approximately one week behind vs. the untreated controls. • They rapidly produced new vegetative growth and established an improved, fuller habit following pruning. • Resulting plants showed improved structure and continued to maintain their form later in the trial.
control
cut back
Paclo @ 3ppm Paclo @ 5ppm
Rudbeckia Rising Sun™ Chestnut Gold
Calibrachoa, Verbena, Petunia, and Rudbeckia exhibited an intermediate response, with flowering generally delayed approximately 1–2 weeks following cutback. • These varieties required additional time to re- establish flowering compared with the faster- recovering group but still developed denser and more compact canopies than the untreated controls. • The temporary delay in flowering was offset by improved plant structure and appearance later in the production cycle.
control
cut back
Paclo @ 3ppm Paclo @ 5ppm
30 mast young plants 1.800.541.3910
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker