Keystone Law - January 2021

Take a look at our newsletter this month.

Trust Matters JANUARY 2021


Common Sense Isn’t That Common How We Can Fix That

On Jan. 10, 1776, founding father Thomas Paine published a controversial 130-page “pamphlet” called “Common Sense.” Paine urged the colonists to break free of Britain’s rule, arguing that the time had come for the colonies to become its own nation. At the time, that idea was bitterly debated. It wasn’t common sense for everyone to think this way. I think we’re living with that division today. It doesn’t feel like common sense is quite as common anymore. For example, I believe taking responsibility for our actions and choosing how we react are sensical values we should all share. This lesson hit hardest when I was a sophomore in high school and had gotten in trouble with the law a few times. I finally realized that it wasn’t my friends or the people I was trying to impress who were forcing me to make these choices. I made those choices, and I had the power to change what I was doing and what was happening as a result. Something clicked for me that day, and I learned that everything in our lives is a direct result of the choices we make. To me, that’s common sense. That’s something we should all understand and live by, but it’s not a virtue everyone has. In fact, today, there are so many independent ideas that we believe to be hard-and-fast rules that we seem to have lost our unity and commonality. I believe there is too much of a focus on our differences, and while we should always be curious to learn about things and people who are different from us, I think we need to celebrate more of what we have in common. I understand this. I fit squarely into what everyone describes as a minority because I’m half Hispanic. I bring diversity to my industry, the boards I sit on, and the work I do in the community. I’m proud

to offer that, but people have taken this idea of diversity and turned it into a reason for division. It’s become the exact opposite of its intention. This new year, I believe we have an opportunity to unite again. We can strive for common sense and unity right away on New Year’s Day! No matter what culture or religion we come from, we all celebrate this day and welcome the start of a new year on Jan. 1 — every single year. We can start this new year by taking steps toward coming together. It can be a resolution we all work toward. To be honest, I’m not one for New Year’s resolutions. I like to break down my goals into quarterly achievements. Someone once said to me — and I’m paraphrasing here — we overestimate how much we can get done in one year, but we underestimate how much we can get done in five years. That’s been the backbone of Keystone Law Firm’s success! In five years, we’ve gone from an office of four people to nearly 35. Actively working toward goals together on a quarterly basis has helped us achieve what we have so far.

Book Francisco for Your Event!

In addition to educating clients about estate planning, Francisco Sirvent also shares his expertise with others by speaking at local and national events. If you would like to book Francisco for your event, don’t wait! The first quarter is filling up fast! For more details, email today!

I hope this year we can all find the courage to focus on what unites us and take the steps — it doesn’t have to be a leap! — toward coming together.

It just makes sense.

-Francisco | 1

Is the Hot Toddy Indian or Irish? A Closer Look at Our Favorite Winter Warmer

The Irish Account: Dr. Todd’s Boozy Cure‑All

Jan. 11 is National Hot Toddy Day, but how much do you really know about this popular winter drink? Though the word “toddy” sounds British to American ears, it actually has a contested history split between two entirely different countries: India and Ireland.

way, the results are delicious and easy to replicate in your own kitchen. If you could use a pick-me-up, try this recipe inspired by

The Indians and the British aren’t the only ones who’ve claimed the toddy: The Irish have a stake, too. As the story goes, once upon a time in Ireland, there lived a doctor named Robert Bentley Todd. His signature cure-all was a combination of hot brandy, cinnamon, and sugar water, and it was so well-known (and tasty) that eventually, his patients named the drink in his honor.


The Indian Affair: How the British Stole the ‘Taddy’

• 3/4 cup water • 1 1/2 oz whiskey • 2 tsp honey (or agave nectar for a vegan version) • 2 tsp lemon juice • 1 lemon round • 1 cinnamon stick

Today’s hot toddy is a steaming blend of whiskey, tea, honey, and lemon. But back in the early 1600s, it may have had different ingredients. According to, around that time, a popular drink called the “taddy” existed in British-controlled India. Originally, the Hindi word “taddy” described a beverage made with fermented palm sap, but a written account from 1786 revealed that the ingredients had evolved to include alcohol, hot water, sugar, and spices. The British swiped the idea of a “taddy” and brought it home to England. Legend has it that in northern England’s cozy pubs, the “taddy” became the “toddy.”

How to Make a Modern Hot Toddy


We may never know the true origin story of the hot toddy,

1. Heat the water in a teapot or the microwave. Pour it into a mug. 2. Add the whiskey, honey, and lemon juice and stir until the honey is dissolved. 3. Garnish with the lemon round and cinnamon stick and enjoy!

but speculates that it’s somewhere in the middle of the two accounts. Either

... continued from Page 4

This judge-to-be was named William Marbury, and he took his case straight to the U.S. Supreme Court. After hearing the case, Marshall had two options. He could side with Jefferson, even though he believed he was legally wrong, or he could side with Marbury and risk the wrath of the president, who he feared would dissolve the court. In a historic twist, he chose door No. 3. Digging through the Constitution, Marshall discovered a line that required cases to go through a lower court before coming to the Supreme Court. That made Marbury v. Madison , which had come to the Supreme Court directly, out of Marshall’s jurisdiction. It also made the law Marbury had operated under unconstitutional. When Marshall pointed this out, it was the first time the Supreme Court had ever ruled on constitutionality, which set the precedent for its power today. If Marshall hadn’t cared so much about opposing his second cousin in 1803, it’s possible that Judge Barrett’s nomination in 2020 would have been much less contentious.

To learn more about this crazy piece of history, check out “Kitten Kick the Giggly Blue Robot All Summer,” an episode of the podcast “Radiolab.”

Chief Justice John Marshall

2 | 480-418-1776


The reality TV show “The Bachelorette” is known for being packed with drama, but last year there was just as much scandal among its contestants off-screen as there was while the cameras were rolling. Late in 2020, not one but two past “Bachelorette” contestants ended up in court. ‘THE BACHELORETTE’ CONTESTANTS GO TO COURT Judge, Will You Accept This Rose? One of them was Chad Johnson, hailing from the group of hunks who competed for Bachelorette JoJo Fletcher’s attention in season 12. That season aired in 2016, but it wasn’t until two years later that Johnson sued Sunset Studios Entertainment and one of its executives, Cristina Cimino, for sexual harassment, failure to prevent harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, fraud by intentional misrepresentation, and wrongful failure to hire in violation of public policy. According to Deadline, Cimino told Johnson she would help him get movie roles with her studio, but that never happened. Instead, she allegedly lured him into in-person meetings and bombarded him with inappropriate calls and text messages. After years of back-and-forth, the case is finally moving forward. In July 2020, a judge ruled that all of Johnson’s accusations were proven except failure to hire. Upping the drama, Deadline reported that “no attorneys for Cimino or the studio participated in the hearing.” Meanwhile, another “Bachelorette” contestant, Luke Parker, has been ordered by the court to pay $100,000 for breach of contract. Parker, who vied for the affection of Hannah Brown in the 2019 season, has allegedly been making media appearances without the consent of the show’s production company, NZK Productions Inc. Each appearance was a breach of contract, and now he owes the company a pretty penny: $25,000 per appearance. According to Page Six, Parker might also be on the hook for bad-mouthing the show and/or sharing information about what happened on set — both things his contract forbids. Hopefully, the 2021 season of “The Bachelorette,” which should air later this year following the postponed 2020 season, will feature less drama than these real-life legal battles.


Inspired by

• 8 chicken thighs or Ingredients

• 2 garlic cloves, sliced • 14 oz chicken stock • 1 sprig rosemary • Finely grated zest and juice of 1/2 lemon • 1/4 cup fresh parsley, finely chopped

drumsticks, lightly salted

• 1 tbsp olive oil • 1 tbsp all-purpose flour • 1 onion, finely sliced • 2 celery sticks, thickly sliced • 2 carrots, thickly sliced • 1 leek, thickly sliced • 1 lb potatoes, peeled and cut in large chunks


1. In a large frying pan, heat oil and fry salted chicken on high until brown. 2. Transfer chicken to the slow cooker. Add flour and stir. 3. In the frying pan on high heat, fry the onion, celery, carrots, leeks, and potatoes until lightly browned. Add garlic and fry for 30 seconds. 4. Transfer vegetables to the slow cooker and add the stock, rosemary, and lemon zest. 5. Cook on high for 2.5–3 hours or until chicken is tender. 6. Check seasoning and add lemon juice to taste. Top with parsley before serving. | 3



2701 W. QUEEN CREEK RD., #3 CHANDLER, AZ 85248


Finding Common Sense by Discovering What Unites Us



Is the Hot Toddy Indian or Irish?

Slow Cooker Chicken Casserole ‘The Bachelorette’ Contestants Go to Court


The Cousin Rivalry That Gave the Supreme Court Its Power



When Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away and Judge Amy Coney Barrett was nominated to take her place, the eyes of the country turned to the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s no secret that the court has a lot of power. Its decisions, like Loving v. Virginia , Brown v. Board of Education , and Roe v. Wade , have reshaped America. But how did just nine people come to hold so much sway? Well, the answer lies with two rival second cousins: Thomas Jefferson and John Marshall. Back in 1803, the Supreme Court was the laughingstock of Washington. It was a collection of misfits (including a man nicknamed “Red Old Bacon Face”) and met in Congress’ basement. When Marshall was chief justice of the court and Jefferson was president, the cousin controversy reared its head. Marshall and Jefferson were in rival political parties and, to add insult to injury, Marshall’s mother-in-law had once spurned Jefferson’s romantic advances, according to Washington legend. In 1803, Jefferson (a Republican) was upset because a judge whom his predecessor, President John Adams (a Federalist), had tried to appoint was suing Jefferson’s secretary of state over failing to actually appoint him.

The Supreme Court met in these windowless chambers from 1819 to 1860.

Continued on Page 2 ...

4 | 480-418-1776

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online