using manikin data (compression fraction, ventilation rate) and qualitative rubrics (team communication, leadership). FOR EDUCATORS AND PROGRAM DIRECTORS For faculty, simulation provides the structure and repeatability traditional clinical experiences lack. Each student can face identical scenarios under con- trolled variables, allowing fair evaluation and performance benchmarking. Simulation technology enables educators to collect quantifiable metrics— time to defibrillation, medication accuracy, airway success rate—creating a
data-driven foundation for remediation and continuous improvement. Recording and playback functions make post-event debriefs richer, turning each session into a research opportunity for pedagogy and performance. Simulation aligns seamlessly with accred- itation standards from CoAEMSP, NREMT, and NAEMSE, all of which now encourage or require simulation in curricula. In- structors can document compliance, skill competency, and continuing education hours through standardized scenario logs—valuable for audits and grants. FOR AGENCIES AND SYSTEMS directly to system performance metrics such as return-of-spontaneous-circula- tion (ROSC) rates, on-scene times, and medication error reduction. From a risk-management perspective, simulation helps reduce liability expo - sure by documenting workforce com - petency and adherence to protocol. It also supports recruitment and retention: younger clinicians are drawn to agencies that invest in professional development and technology.
EMS simulation strengthens entire organizations. Agencies that adopt routine simulation training report measurable improvements in patient safety, op - erational readiness, and team coordination. Training outcomes can be tied
Simply put, simulation elevates every stakeholder—from the classroom to the command staff. It improves skill, strengthens confidence, and cultivates a culture of quality across the EMS system.
9
Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software