FY16 Green Bond Impact Report

GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT

FINANCIAL YEAR 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contents

Introduction ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 1

Green Bond Eligible Projects Summary - FY16_________________________________________________________ 2

Industry Engagement ____________________________________________________________________________________ 3

Awards and Acknowledgements ________________________________________________________________________ 4

IFC’s Green Bond Process ________________________________________________________________________________ 5

Green Bonds Issuance Program - FY16 _________________________________________________________________ 8

Use of Proceeds Reporting_______________________________________________________________________________ 9

Impact Reporting _______________________________________________________________________________________ 11

Interpreting Impact Indicators ________________________________________________________________________ 12

Impact Assessment: Green Bond Eligible Projects Committed in FY16 and FY15 ________________ 13

Featured Projects _______________________________________________________________________________________ 22

Authors and Contacts __________________________________________________________________________________ 24

Disclaimer_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 25

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Introduction

We are pleased to present this annual Impact Report for IFC’s Green Bond Program covering financial year 2016 (FY16). IFC remains one of the world’s largest financiers of climate-smart projects for developing countries. Since 2005, IFC has invested more than $15 billion in long-term financing for renewable power, energy efficiency, sustainable agriculture, and green buildings, with an additional $10 billion in core mobilization. We believe that climate change is a fundamental threat to development in our lifetime, with the potential to impact millions, threatening agricultural livelihoods, increasing the incidence of natural disasters and affecting water, energy, and food supplies. A recent World Bank study “Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty” shows that if not properly mitigated, climate change can push more than 100 million people back into poverty over the next 15 years, hitting the poorest regions of the world – Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia – the hardest. At the World Bank Group's 2015 Annual Meetings, President Jim Kim pledged to step up the Group’s investments in climate to 28% of annual commitments and leverage an additional $13 billion of private sector co-financing by year 2020. Two months later, the historic climate agreement at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris was made. The Paris Agreement is a major turning point for the global climate change agenda, laying a green path for greater opportunities for the private sector. Aligned with COP21 agenda, IFC is in an unprecedented position to help its private sector clients capture opportunities through investments, innovative financing, and advisory work to address regulatory and policy obstacles to green growth. As part of the World Bank Group Climate Change Action Plan adopted in April 2016, IFC released its Climate Implementation Plan, which serves as a roadmap to achieving the pledge set by President Kim through the following objectives: 1) Scale climate investments to reach 28% of IFC’s annual financing by 2020 2) Catalyze $13 billion in private sector capital annually by 2020 to climate sectors through mobilization, aggregation, and de-risking products 3) Maximize impact through GHG emissions reduction and resilience of investments 4) Account for climate risk in IFC’s investment selection. Developing innovative financing products to spur additional climate investments through the capital markets is key to IFC’s mandate and underpins its commitment to promote continued growth and development of the Green Bond market. We believe that capital markets have an indispensable role to play in channeling money into much needed climate investments by leveraging private capital.

“Climate change impacts everyone, but the effects will be most acutely felt by people in developing countries. The response to IFC’s Green Bonds demonstrates the enormous potential of capital market mechanisms to mobilize long-term investment for climate finance and leverage the power of the private sector.”

IFC Vice President and Treasurer Jingdong Hua

Page 1

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Green Bond Eligible Projects Summary - FY16

COMMITMENTS In FY16 1 , IFC’s climate-related investments were close to $2 billion and an additional $1.3 billion was raised through core mobilization, for a total of $3.3 billion invested in climate-smart projects. About 55% of IFC’s overall climate related portfolio was eligible for financing from Green Bond Proceeds. In FY16, new Green Bond financed commitments were close to $1 billion in 35 projects across 22 countries , including 16 new markets such as Bangladesh, Cambodia and China. Investments in green banking and green buildings represent the two largest sectors, amounting to 59% of the Green Bond financed projects. DISBURSEMENTS During the fiscal year, disbursements to Green Bond Eligible Projects amounted to $754 million , of which $328 million was disbursed to projects committed in FY16.

IMPACT The 35 new projects financed through Green Bonds in FY16 contribute approximately 1 million MWh in annual renewable energy generation , sufficient to supply close to 74,000 US households with electricity for one year. 2 The contribution to GHG emissions reduced through new projects was 1.3 million tons of CO 2 -equivalent, which compares to taking around 275,000 cars off the road. 3 New projects in the wind energy and the green banking sectors account for 57% of the total GHGs reduced.

1 IFC’s financial year spans from July 1 st to June 30 th . 2 Equivalencies calculated using the US EPA Calculator, available at http://www2.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator 3 Equivalencies calculated using the US EPA Calculator, available at http://www2.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator

Page 2

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Industry Engagement

Throughout FY16, IFC continued its leadership role in developing the Green Bond market as an active member of the Executive Committee (EXCOM) for the Green Bond Principles (GBP). IFC actively participated in the drafting of the

updated version of the voluntary set of transparency and disclosure guidelines published in June 2016. The GBP have gained broad market acceptance, as good practice driving transparency and accountability, and membership grew close to 125 members in 2016. IFC also participated in the EXCOM’s five working groups on strategic topics, such as Standard/Assurance, Defining Green, Impact Reporting, Database/Index criteria, and New Markets. IFC was re-elected for a two-year term on the EXCOM in June 2016. The G20 Green Finance Study Group (GFSG) was set up in January 2016 and IFC has been a key member of the group tasked with the mandate to “identify institutional and market barriers to green finance, and based on country experiences, develop options on how to enhance the ability of the financial system to mobilize private capital for green investment.” Emerging from the GFSG’s work are a number of options for the G20 country authorities to consider for voluntary adoption to enhance the ability of the financial system to mobilize private capital for green investment. In September 2016, at the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, China, global leaders endorsed a set of recommendations 4 to boost green finance and called on the IFC-supported Sustainable Banking Network (SBN) and other partners to help lead the implementation. This marks the recognition of the central role the financial sector plays in reducing

“I N ADDITION TO IFC’ S STRONG CREDIT PROFILE , THERE ARE TWO COMPONENTS OF IFC’ S G REEN B OND PROGRAM THAT DISTINGUISH IT AS ESPECIALLY ATTRACTIVE FOR INVESTORS : IMPACT REPORTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SECOND OPINION . IFC’ S WORK TOWARD HARMONIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT METRICS AND ITS ENGAGEMENT WITH C ICERO FOR A SECOND PARTY OPINION ARE EXTREMELY HELPFUL AS INVESTORS LOOK TO EVALUATE THE IMPACT OF PROJECTS IN A G REEN B OND PROGRAM .”

ASHLEY SCHULTEN, PORTFOLIO MANAGER AT BLACKROCK

climate change and advancing environmentally sustainable growth. Formed in 2012, SBN brings together central banks, regulators and trade associations from across emerging markets that seek to transform domestic financial systems to advance national goals on climate change and sustainable growth. IFC acts as secretariat for SBN and contributes its expertise in establishing and implementing environmental, social and governance standards that have become the global benchmark for finance across emerging markets.

4 The Synthesis Report and a full range of GFSG input papers is available at: http://g20.org/English/Documents/Current/201608/P020160815359441639994.pdf

Page 3

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Awards and Acknowledgements

IFC’s Green Bond program was lauded through a number of industry awards and tributes:

 EMEA Finance - Best Local Currency Green Bond for IFC’s ZAR 1 billion issuance (2015)

 Climate Bond Initiative - Inaugural Green Bond for IFC’s February 2013 $1 billion note as the market’s first ever USD 1 billion Green Bond (2016)  The Asset “Triple A” Asia Infrastructure Award - Best Green Bond Facility for the five-year green Masala bonds which raised 3.15 billion rupees for private sector investments that address climate change in India (2016).

Environmental Finance Magazine conferred two accolades to IFC:

 Special Award for Innovation for the Structure of the Yes Bank / IFC 'back-to-back' transaction (2016)

 Special Award for the Impact Reporting Initiative , a collaboration with a number of other multilateral development banks serving as a guide for issuers on post-issuance transparency. Its recommendations include annual reporting on the projects financed and their environmental impact (2016).

Page 4

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

IFC’s Green Bond Process

IFC Green Bond Program follows best market practice, and is compliant with the Green Bond Principles.

USE OF PROCEEDS Proceeds from IFC’s Green Bonds are allocated to a special sub-portfolio that is linked to lending operations for climate-related projects (“Eligible Projects”). Eligible Projects are selected from IFC’s climate-related loan portfolio, which comprises projects that meet IFC Definitions and Metrics for Climate-Related Activities 5 . Only the loan portions of the projects are eligible for funding via Green Bond Proceeds (equity investments and guarantees are ineligible). The sub- portfolio is credited as disbursements are made towards Eligible Projects.

Projects eligible for Green Bond financing include the following sectors:

Renewable energy (RE): investments in equipment, systems and services which enable the productive use of energy from renewable resources such as wind, hydro, solar and geothermal production Energy efficiency (EE): investments in equipment, systems and services which result in a reduced use of energy per unit of product or service generated, such as waste heat recovery, cogeneration, building insulation, energy loss reduction in transmission and distribution Resource efficiency: investments to improve industrial processes, services and products that enhance the conversion efficiency of manufacturing inputs (energy, water, raw materials) to saleable outputs, including reduction of impact at source



5 Please see IFC’s definitions here: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/CB_Home/Measuring+Reporting/

Page 5

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Cleaner technology production: investments in manufacturing of components used in energy efficiency or renewable energy, such as solar photovoltaics, manufacture of turbines or building insulation materials Financial intermediaries: lending to financial intermediaries with the requirement that IFC’s investments are on-lent to climate projects that fit IFC’s Green Bond eligibility criteria Sustainable forestry: investments that reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation by supporting sustainable management of natural forests.



EVALUATION AND SELECTION In addition to meeting the Green Bond Principles eligibility criteria, all Eligible Projects have been implemented in consistency with IFC’s Sustainability Framework, including the Performance Standards and World Bank Group EHS Guidelines, IFC’s Corporate Governance Framework and disclosure requirements of the IFC Access to Information Policy. All projects have undergone a rigorous ESG due diligence process and are subject to ongoing monitoring and supervision. IFC’s project evaluation and selection criteria have been reviewed by the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research at the University of Oslo (CICERO). CICERO’s Second Opinion is published on IFC’s website. MANAGEMENT OF PROCEEDS All proceeds from IFC Green Bonds are set aside in a designated Green Cash Account and are invested in accordance with IFC’s conservative liquidity policy until disbursement to Eligible Projects. Disbursement requests for Eligible Projects take place in accordance with IFC’s established policies and procedures and are oftenmade over a period of time depending on project milestones etc. In some cases, the climate-related component of a project supported by Green Bonds may be a part of a larger investment. In such cases, the Green Bond portfolio only finances the eligible portion of the project.

Monitoring of the projects comprises regular reports by the investee company on project activities and performance throughout the lifetime of investment.

Page 6

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

REPORTING IFC Green Bond Impact Report follows the GBP’s reference framework for reporting “Working towards a harmonized framework for Green Bond impact reporting”, which aims at ensuring integrity of the market through increased transparency. The Impact Report provides a list of projects that received funding fromGreen Bond proceeds and, subject to confidentiality considerations, also provides a brief description of each project, the amounts committed, and the expected environmental impact. The report only covers projects eligible for Green Bond financing, for more information on IFC’s climate-related financing and other activities visit www.ifc.org/climatebusiness.

Page 7

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Green Bonds Issuance Program - FY16

In FY16, IFC issued 23 Green Bonds in public, private and retail format across seven currencies amounting to a total volume of $1.4 billion, the highest annual issuance since the inception of IFC’s Green Bond Program. Highlighted issuances include: two offerings in November 2015 - a debut ZAR 1 billion ($71 million) Green Bond, which was the first Green Bond issued by a multilateral in South Africa, and a $500 million Green Bond, marking IFC’s return to green benchmark issuances. In March 2016, IFC issued a 10 year $700 million Green Bond, IFC’s longest tenor Green Bond to date. The bond was subsequently reopened in July 2016 and increased to $1.2 billion, subscribed to by a well-diversified range of around 65 investors.

During the year, the first ever $1 billion dollar Green Bond issued by IFC in February 2013, matured in May 2016.

As of June 30, 2016, IFC’s outstanding Green Bonds amounted to around $3 billion.

IFC HISTORICAL GREEN BOND ISSUANCE

1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600

- 200 400 600 800

FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

IFC CUMULATIVE GREEN BOND ISSUANCE BY CURRENCY

INR 1% Other 2%

CNH 2%

ZAR 3%

AUD 3%

TRY 4%

MXN NZD EUR PEN

BRL 6%

USD 79%

Page 8

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Use of Proceeds Reporting

In the last three years (from FY14 to FY16), there were 93 Green Bond Eligible Projects supported by IFC’s Green Bond Proceeds. The total committed amount for these projects is close to $3 billion, of which approximately $1.9 billion has been disbursed. The current pipeline of undisbursed commitments to Green Bond Eligible Projects is $1.1 billion.

COMMITMENTS BY SECTOR

USD millions

FY14

FY15

FY16

Renewable Energy

756

808

305

Energy Efficiency

296

521

Other Mitigation (RE/EE)

134

Total

936

1,155

960

COMMITMENTS BY REGION

USD millions

FY14

FY15

FY16

Europe and Central Asia

178

382

284

East Asia and the Pacific

229

South Asia

155

200

Middle East and North Africa

143

118

Latin America and the Caribbean

618

422

Sub-Saharan Africa

Multi Region

Total

936

1,155

960

DISBURSEMENTS BY REGION

USD millions

FY14

FY15

FY16

Europe and Central Asia

228

265

Latin America and the Caribbean

156

551

210

Middle East and North Africa

123

South Asia

125

117

Sub-Saharan Africa

East Asia and the Pacific

Total

242

956

754

Page 9

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

FY16 COMMITMENTS BY SECTOR

FY16 COMMITMENTS BY REGION

Sub-Saharan Africa 4%

Latin America 9%

Other Mitigation 14%

Renewable Energy 32%

Europe and Central Asia 30%

Middle East and North Africa 12%

South Asia 21%

Energy Efficiency 54%

East Asia/the Pacific 24%

FY16 DISBURSEMENTS BY REGION

Sub-Saharan Africa 3%

East Asia/the Pacific 2%

South Asia 16%

Europe and Central Asia 35%

Middle East and North Africa 16%

Latin America 28%

Page 10

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Impact Reporting

IMPACT INDICATORS IFC reports on a number of core indicators for projects included in the Green Bond Program in accordance with the Harmonized Framework for Impact Reporting developed by a group of multilateral development banks including IFC. The four core indicators are as follows:

Annual energy savings

Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduced or avoided

Annual renewable energy produced

Capacity of renewable energy plant(s) constructed or rehabilitated

IFC ACCESS TO INFORMATION POLICY The Access to Information Policy is the cornerstone of IFC’s Sustainability Framework and articulates IFC’s commitment to transparency. IFC seeks to provide accurate and timely information regarding our investment and advisory services to clients, partners, and stakeholders. We disclose information relevant to project, environmental, and social issues, and expected development impact, prior to consideration by our Board of Directors. Through the life of each project IFC updates environmental and social information as necessary to ensure the continued accuracy of the information disclosed prior to investment. This commitment also applies to projects funded by the Green Bond Program.

Page 11

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Interpreting Impact Indicators

IFC’s investment is pro-rated against the climate related portion of the project to derive the amount of the “Climate Loan Committed.” Climate impact indicators are tracked on a project-level basis and have not been pro-rated for the portion of IFC’s contribution. Some climate projects contribute to mitigation, but do not have an agreed methodology for impact’s calculation. Investments in financial intermediaries ensure that climate finance is available for smaller clients that IFC cannot reach directly, such as small and medium sized enterprises. It is important for IFC that our partner financial intermediaries assess climate impact of their investments, and therefore, IFC has developed a web-based application CAFI (Climate Assessment for FI Investment), which enables the partners to monitor the results of investments in the areas of energy efficiency, renewable energy, climate adaptation, and special climate. 6

IFC’s GHG Methodology and Climate Related Definitions and Metrics are available at IFC’s Climate Business website. 7

The Impact Assessment table allows for quantification of a few core indicators, but it is important to appreciate the limitations of the data reported. The main considerations to adequately interpret the results are:

• Scope of results: Reporting is based on “ex-ante” estimates at the time of project appraisal and mostly for direct project effects.

• Uncertainty: An important consideration in estimating impact indicators is that they are often based on a number of assumptions. While technical experts aim tomake sound and conservative assumptions that are reasonable based on the information available at the time, the actual impact of the projects may diverge from initial projections. In general, behavioral changes or shifts in baseline conditions can cause deviations from projections. • Comparability: Caution should be taken in comparing projects, sectors, or whole portfolios because baselines (and base years) and calculation methods may vary significantly. In addition, the cost structures between countries will also vary, so that developing cost-efficiency calculations (results per unit of amount invested in Eligible Projects) could place smaller countries with limited economies of scale at a disadvantage and will not take into consideration country specific context. • Omissions: Projects may have impact across a much wider range of indicators than captured in the Impact Assessment table and may have other important development impacts. Furthermore, there may be some projects for which the proposed core indicator is either not applicable or the data is not available. While IFC takes efforts to improve the consistency and availability of reported metrics over time, projects with climate impact can range over a wide diversity of sectors and sub-sectors making complete harmonization of reporting metrics challenging.

6 See http://www.ifc.org/cafi 7 http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/CB_Home/Measuring+Reporting/

Page 12

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Impact Assessment: Green Bond Eligible Projects Committed in FY16 and FY15

The Impact Assessment table below lists the expected climate results from projects funded, in whole or in part, with IFC Green Bond proceeds. The projects are organized by sector and are categorized by project type as RE for renewable energy, EE for energy efficiency and RE/EE for combined and other mitigation.

Reporting is based on “ex-ante” estimates at the time of project appraisal. As the Impact Assessment table includes the estimated results of projects that are still in the construction or implementation phase, there is no guarantee that these results will ultimately materialize. The reporting is thus not intended to provide actual results achieved in a specific year or reporting period.

The Impact Assessment covers only projects committed in FY16 and FY15. The table does not include impact indicators of projects committed in earlier years.

As the table below illustrated, new Green Bond Eligible Project commitments for two years - FY16 and FY15 - totaled $2.1 billion. Disbursements for the projects committed in FY16 and FY15 amounted to $1.2 billion. These projects are expected to contribute 4.5millionMWh in annual renewable energy generation, sufficient to supply over 330,000 US households with electricity. They also should yield total GHG reductions of almost 3.8 million tons of CO2-equivalent, comparable to taking around 800,000 cars off the road.

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Solar

Azure_PV_40MW

FY16

India

38003

9.2

69,000

n/a

51,266

Construction of four solar power plants to increase private sector investment in low income states

Azure_Raj_40MW

FY16

India

38004

9.2

69,000

n/a

51,266

Azure Sunrise

FY16

India

38005

11.5

86,000

n/a

63,897

Azure Clean

FY15

India

35058

13.9

63,350

n/a

49,210

Increasing production and sales of solar modules to promote the development of utility scale solar power plants

Multi- Country

Canadian Solar

FY16

36142

40.0

n/a

Page 13

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Construction of a 50 MW solar plant providing energy to approximately 60,000 customers annually Construction of a solar power plant for the Chilean mining industry, which accounts for 40% of country’s total energy consumption Construction of a 100 MW concentrated solar power plant in response to South Africa’s electricity constraints

FRV Solar Jordan

FY16

Jordan

36877

19.0

143,187

n/a

86,893

Luz del Norte

FY15

Chile

34405

60.0

394,700

n/a

162

170,803

Abengoa CSP Xina

FY15

South Africa

34051

43.1

351,133

n/a

100

294,874

Acme Solar NSM 1

FY15

India

35187

6.4

38,536

n/a

28,516

Construction of five solar plants by Acme Solar and its subsidiaries to increase solar power generation by 100MW and alleviate India’s power shortage

Acme Solar NSM 2

FY15

India

36019

6.4

38,536

n/a

28,516

Acme Solar NSM 3

FY15

India

36021

6.4

38,536

n/a

28,516

Acme Solar NSM 4

FY15

India

36022

6.4

38,536

n/a

28,516

Acme Solar NSM 6

FY15

India

36048

7.1

38,536

n/a

27,398

Adenium Jordan 1

FY15

Jordan

35467

11.3

25,663

n/a

15,573

Adenium Jordan 2

FY15

Jordan

34726

11.3

25,663

n/a

15,573

Construction of five solar plants on a build-own-operate basis to diversify the fuel mix for Jordan and increase energy security

Adenium Jordan 3

FY15

Jordan

34728

11.3

25,663

n/a

15,573

Arabia One Solar

FY15

Jordan

35474

10.5

21,704

n/a

13,171

Jordan Solar One

FY15

Jordan

35479

14.4

47,000

n/a

28,322

Aura Solar II

FY15

Honduras

35364

24.4

117,000

n/a

53,317

Construction of three solar power plants demonstrating viability of utility- scale solar power in Honduras

SunEdison HON3

FY15

Honduras

34975

41.7

168,753

n/a

74,359

Valle Solar PV

FY15

Honduras

35080

30.0

125,100

n/a

55,124

Page 14

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Wind

Ostro Andhra

FY16

India

37086

29.5

256,790

n/a

190,792

Construction of two wind farms to increase clean energy production to reach approximately 0.5 million individuals by 2019

Ostro AP Wind

FY16

India

38398

30.8

278,410

n/a

206,856

Construction of the first independent and privately owned RE power plant in Jamaica to modernize, diversify and improve the competitiveness of the energy sector Construction of two wind farms to capitalize on Pakistan’s favorable wind power environment and support a newly issued wind feed-in tariff (FIT) regime Financing five wind power farms with a total capacity of 242 MW in 5 low- income states of India Construction of a 215 MW wind power plant, the largest wind project in Panama and located in one of the least developed provinces Construction of a 34 MW wind farm to meet Croatia's growing power demand and reduce reliance on imported energy

BMR Wind

FY15

Jamaica

35081

10.0

104,300

n/a

66,136

Dawood TGL

FY15

Pakistan

30145

22.0

126,300

n/a

55,822

Gul Ahmed Wind

FY15

Pakistan

35088

11.6

151,900

n/a

93,783

Green Infra Wind

FY15

India

35415

55.2

405,716

n/a

242

285,218

Penonome Wind

FY15

Panama

34810

80.0

512,000

n/a

215

188,434

Rudine WPP

FY15

Croatia

34079

24.9

75,660

n/a

25,836

Page 15

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Hydro Power

Construction of seven new run-of-the- river small hydropower plants to power tea production plants Construction of a run-of-the-river hydropower plant under a build-own- operate transfer plan to reduce power generation costs Increasing hydropower supply to improve access to reliable and affordable electricity in the eastern and western regions of Nepal

KTDA Small Hydro

FY16

Kenya

36402

12.5

100,133

59,742

Gulpur Hydro

FY15

Pakistan

32874

50.0

360,000

102

170,946

Kabeli

FY15

Nepal

30977

19.3

205,200

114,441

Green Buildings

Installation of solar panels on commercial rooftops for a retail chain

RE/ EE

Arpico Retail

FY16

Sri Lanka

33883

7.5

4,809

2,326

Construction of new housing compliant with green buildings standards to facilitate the creation of a sustainable living environment

Ciputra Res Loan

FY16

Indonesia

37122

30.0

Hotel expansion and new hotels' construction in Cairo applying green building standards

Credence

FY16

Egypt

33360

10.5

Construction of new campus buildings following IFC's Green Building Standard (EDGE) and reducing the use of energy, water and materials by 20 percent

Acleda Education

FY16

Cambodia

35242

13.0

Page 16

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Expansion and retrofitting of existing academic buildings to reduce water and energy usage, progressively developing a "green campus" Building of a new commercial center in Accra, incorporating green building standards, operational efficiency and advanced technologies Construction of an international- standard hotel and retail space integrating green building design principles

Eurasia Univ

FY16

China

37659

35.1

Exchange-Debt

FY16

Ghana

35396

26.3

Ibis Mongolia

FY16

Mongolia

37451

6.5

1,454,215

777

M2RE II – AfH

FY16

Georgia

37432

11.5

Implementing green building standards for Georgia's first 3-star international hotel and an affordable housing project

M2RE II-Ramada

FY16

Georgia

37431

7.0

1,355,496

Construction of green residential buildings in India

PNBHF Green Bond

FY16

India

37417

75.0

1,423

Construction of a new retail space for a supermarket chain implementing green building best practices Construction of a green university building that can accommodate more than 5,000 students

Schwarz IV

FY16

Bulgaria

36671

89.7

8,388

USAL Exp

FY16

Argentina

37778

6.9

365,761

165

Building of a 243-bed energy efficient hospital facility in Chittagong

STS Chittagong

FY16

Bangladesh

31841

17.5

Page 17

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Enhancing healthcare access via one of the country’s first public- private healthcare projects that uses modern, energy efficient technologies and infrastructure

Adana Health

FY15

Turkey

34358

43.7

14,254,326

6,721

Kayseri Health

FY15

Turkey

31029

37.6

18,067,000

8,519

Energy-efficient technologies for a network of hospitals

Etlik Health

FY15

Turkey

33677

82.2

36,971,000

17,432

Green Banking

Sustainable energy financing to medium-sized enterprises

RE/ EE

AAIB SL

FY16

Egypt

37161

50.0

n/a

119,176

Government partnership with RCBC to mobilize long-term funds that support the country’s long term infrastructure needs On-lending to renewable energy projects. A follow-on investment from FY14 and FY15. Financing of climate mitigation projects through Turkey’s first privately-owned development and investment bank Scale-up of lending to climate-smart businesses looking to adopt and improve their renewable and energy- efficient technologies

DCM RCBC Bond

FY16

Philippines

37489

22.5

n/a

12,586

FY16 FY15

EMILIA

Chile

33707

55.0

n/a

RE/ EE

DCM TSKB Climate

FY16

Turkey

37063

75.0

n/a

62,635

36883/ 34320

RE/ EE

Fransabank SEF 2

FY16

Lebanon

14.0

n/a

54,919

Page 18

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Improving access to finance for mid- sized businesses and promoting Egypt's first sustainable energy financing (SEF) credit line

RE/ EE

NBK - Egypt

FY16

Egypt

37029

25.0

n/a

56,667

Supporting Banco Pichincha to finance climate-smart projects by SMEs

RE/ EE

Pichincha ECU II

FY16

Ecuador

37502

7.5

n/a

18,868

On-lending to sustainable energy projects in SME sector through a local bank

RE/ EE

Abank EE

FY15

Turkey

34488

20.0

n/a

73,350

Financing of smaller non-conventional renewable energy projects

Consorcio RE

FY15

Chile

36053

30.0

n/a

34,652

Improved energy efficiency to reduce SMEs’ energy costs

RE/ EE

FinansL EE II

FY15

Turkey

36153

40.0

n/a

77,824

Expansion of a credit facility to climate- smart projects

RE/ EE

Itau Climate Smart

FY15

Brazil

34525

100.0

n/a

122,987

Green mortgages to improve energy efficiency of the housing sector

Odeabank GrMortg

FY15

Turkey

35827

44.5

n/a

5,914

Scaling-up investments (local and international) by a financial intermediary in renewable energy projects

PFS II

FY15

India

36091

34.1

n/a

30,500

Page 19

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Working capital to finance manufacturers and distributors of solar- powered lighting and energy solutions through Energy Access Fund

Multi- Country

RE/ EE

RA Energy Access

FY15

31386

10.0

n/a

37,143

Long-term funding for sustainable energy projects to a leading leasing company in Turkey

RE/ EE

YKL Sustainable

FY15

Turkey

33950

64.0

n/a

122,163

Agribusiness

Promoting sustainable management of 9,600 hectares of land, including the introduction of regional sustainability standards for 6,300 hectares of teak plantations

RE/ EE

CVA

FY16

Brazil

33683

17.1

n/a

81,305

Conversion of a caustic soda/chlorine production to more environmentally friendly membrane cell technology

RE/ EE

DCM Bharuch II

FY16

India

36511

9.5

n/a

Construction of a new dairy plant and processing line with energy efficiency improvements in Guayaquil Improving industrial energy efficiency for dairy production with a reach of approx. 1,900 farmers in rural Argentina

Lacteos Toni II

FY16

Ecuador

36550

11.0

n/a

Arla AFISA

FY15

Argentina

35983

25.6

n/a

Transport

Construction and electro-mechanical works on a 5.3 km metro line in Istanbul

RE/ EE

Project contributes to climate mitigation, but no IFC methodology exists for impact calculation

MMI Metro Line

FY16

Turkey

37093

65.3

Page 20

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Project Short Name

Project ID

Year

Country

Project Description

$ Million

MWh

KWh

tCO2eq/yr

Acquisition of a fleet of 212 buses operating on natural gas and under modern environmental standards

RE/ EE

Project contributes to climate mitigation, but no IFC methodology exists for impact calculation

Transambiental

FY16

Colombia

36340

12.7

Purchase of 85 railcars for Izmir Metro system to expand public transportation infrastructure

Project contributes to climate mitigation, but no IFC methodology exists for impact calculation

Izmir Railcars

FY15

Turkey

35012

13.2

Industrial Energy

Supporting Cemex’s 2020 Sustainability Enhancement Target to improve environmental performance of the company's operations Improving energy efficiency of a soda ash plant for one of the largest soda ash producers in Southern Europe Improving energy efficiency by revamping furnaces and waste heat recovery for a leading flat glass manufacturer

RE/ EE

Cemex Green

FY16

Mexico

37840

82.0

Bosnia and Herzegovina

SSL Bosnia IV

FY16

37515

6.5

260,897,000

91,968

Trakya Cam VIII

FY16

Turkey

35338

29.3

189,341,615

63,349

TOTAL

$2,103

4,506,814

522,706,413

1,838

3,750,538

Page 21

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Featured Projects

MMI METRO LINE (37093) Expanding the Metro Network in Istanbul Istanbul is home to nearly 20 percent of Turkey’s population and with a 3.45 percent annual growth rate, expects to add around three million more inhabitants by 2023. The population growth presents significant challenges to the city’s infrastructure. In an effort to support this growth in an environmentally sustainable manner, the Metropolitan Municipality of Istanbul (MMI) plans to shift urban travel from road to rail.

Expanding the metro network will allowmore people to take rail transport, alleviating traffic

congestion in favor of a cleaner and more efficient commute. Essential for the plan is bolstering of a vital east- west public transit axis and constructing of Kabatas-Mediciyekoy metro line on the European side of the Bosporus River. IFC led a collective deal together with Intesa Sanpaolo to provide 13-year syndicated financing of $120 million to construct 5.3 kilometer Kabatas-Mediciyekoy metro line, adding three new stations to the metro network. IFC committed $65.3 million to the project on its own account. Running through seven northern districts of Istanbul, the expansion interconnects four existing metro lines, positioning it as an integral part of MMI’s transportation master plan and Istanbul’s infrastructure. The project aims to increase the total daily rail trips to move 450,000 additional passenger trips per weekday and to reduce the average travel commute time. Sustainable city development is a priority for IFC, and programs such as the MMI rail expansion will improve urban mobility and connectivity through an integrated, efficient, and environmentally friendly public transport system.

Page 22

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

AZURE PROJECTS (P38005, P38003 AND P38004) Solar Energy in India

India has an ambitious goal to reach 100,000 MW of solar capacity by 2022, requiring $100 billion in new investments. Although the Indian solar sector has indeed made remarkable gains, it faces critical bottlenecks and shortcomings within the power sector. Approximately 300 million people, close to 25 percent of the country’s population, remain without electricity. In an effort to overcome these challenges and light up more homes and businesses, Azure Power’s most recent solar developments in Karnataka, India’s largest state by population, are increasing the availability of clean, efficient, and dependable energy for all.

As one of the country’s top providers of solar photovoltaic (PV) energy technology and an established IFC partner since 2010, Azure Power builds, owns, and operates small and medium-scale solar plants with a total installed capacity of 356MW. Azure currently has 17 large solar panel installations under operation and another 11 under development – contributing to the company’s goal to deliver 5,000 MW of solar power to the Indian grid by the end of 2020. In 2016, Azure won three separate bids amounting to 130 MW, which together form a large solar complex in the Indian state of Karnataka.

IFC made a loan of US$30 million to three wholly owned subsidiaries: Azure PV, Azure Raj, and Azure Sunrise to help finance these three plants. The long-term nature of IFC’s loanmatches the Azure solar plants’ longevity, ensuring proper financing for years to come. The Karnataka Azure solar complex will soon contribute 226 GWh of electricity yearly with an installed capacity of 130 MW, reaching approximately 116,000 people. It’s estimated that the Karnataka Azure development will help to avoid greenhouse-gas emissions equivalent to approximately 166,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year.

IFC’s work with the Indian solar industry has a notable demonstration effect and will help mature the market as solar energy becomes more viable and renewable energy becomes more attractive to foreign investors.

Page 23

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Authors and Contacts

AUTHORS This report is produced by the IFC Climate Business and Treasury Market Operations Departments. The report was prepared by Esohe Denise Odaro, Berit Lindholdt-Lauridsen, Esther Rojas-Garcia, Francisco Avendano Ugaz, Olga Khlebinskaya, Rusmir Music, Sihui Yan, Thomas Kerr, and Zauresh Kezheneva, and reviewed by Sona Panajyan and Alexandra Klopfer.

CONTACT

IFC Investor Relations International Finance Corporation 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20433 Email: investors@ifc.org Website www.ifc.org/investors Twitter @IFC_Investors

Page 24

IFC GREEN BOND IMPACT REPORT FY16

Disclaimer

This document has been prepared for informational purposes only, and the information herein may be condensed or incomplete. IFC specifically does not make any warranties or representations as to the accuracy or completeness of these materials. IFC is under no obligation to update these materials. This document is not a prospectus and is not intended to provide the basis for the evaluation of any securities issued by IFC. This information does not constitute an invitation or offer to subscribe for or purchase any of the products or services mentioned. Under no circumstances shall IFC or its affiliates be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suffered which is claimed to have resulted fromuse of thesematerials, including without limitation any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages, even if IFC has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

For additional information concerning IFC, please refer to IFC’s current “Information Statement”, financial statements and other relevant information available at www.ifc.org/investors.

Page 25

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16-17 Page 18-19 Page 20-21 Page 22-23 Page 24-25 Page 26-27 Page 28-29 Page 30-31 Page 32-33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37

www.ifc.org

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online