CIPP Payroll: need to know 2019-20

• Employers publishing their family related leave and pay and flexible working policies; and • Whether there should be a requirement for employers to consider advertising jobs as flexible.

This is an area that HR will be heavily involved in and with the volume of recently published consultations, and consequent CIPP surveys which contain many elements relating to the payroll function, we have made the decision to sign post you to complete the government’s survey, if you wish to provide feedback. Responding to the consultation The closing date for this consultation is 11 October and you can respond online through this link, where there is also the option to respond in writing using a word document.

Back to Contents

Call for evidence: non-compliance with right to work checks 16 December 2019

The Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, David Bolt, has launched a ‘call for evidence’ in which he is asking for examples from organisations relating to the Home Office’s use of penalties and sanctions, and explicitly refers to the use of employer nudge letters. All payroll and HR professionals understand that right to work checks must be undertaken prior to the employment of an individual. Dependent on that employee’s nationality, various forms of identification will need to be checked to ensure that they have sufficient right to work in the UK. Failure to adhere to the process of checking an employee’s right to work status and to retain accurate records could result in the non-compliant body facing considerable fines and a custodial sentence may be imposed. ‘Penalties for employing illegal workers’ explains how, if the checks aren’t conducted correctly, or aren’t performed at all, businesses can be fined up to £20,000 for each illegal worker. A ‘referral notice’ would be issued which would be followed by a ‘civil penalty notice’, should the employer be deemed liable, which would allow 28 days for a response. The relevant business’s details may be published by Immigration Enforcement as a cautionary tale to other businesses to dissuade them from employing illegal workers and to encourage them to comply with the process of checking right to work status. The sanctions that can be imposed for non-compliance in this area and possible detrimental effect to the reputation of employers show why it is so important for businesses to act in accordance with legislation during pre-employment right to work assessments. As we prepare to leave Europe it is important to understand the implications of right to work documentation that is required from EU citizens . David Bolt said: “I have recently begun an inspection of the Home Office’s use of sanctions and penalties to encourage and enforce compliance with border and immigration controls and I would like to invite anyone with any relevant knowledge of this subject to write to me with their evidence. Some sanctions and penalties have featured in previous inspection reports, for example, my May 2019 report on Illegal Working. However, in this new inspection I plan to look at the range of sanctions and penalties, focusing on its comprehensiveness, how consistently particular measures are applied and their impact.”

If you have ever received an ‘employer nudge letter’ or indeed have experience of other penalties and sanctions relating to Borders and Immigration the Home Office would like to hear from you.

The contact details provided are:

Email: chiefinspector@icibi.gov.uk

Post: Sanctions and penalties evidence submission, ICIBI, 5th Floor, Globe House, 89 Eccleston Square, London, SW1V 1PN

The Chartered Institute of Payroll Professionals

Payroll: need to know

cipp.org.uk

Page 206 of 629

Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker