A Legal Guide to PRIVACY AND DATA SECURITY 2026

To be lawful under Title VII, an employment exclusion must be based on proven criminal conduct and must be job-related and consistent with business necessity. However, it is important to note that the current EEOC appears to be backing away from investigating or pursuing disparate impact claims in employment and instead focusing its enforcement efforts elsewhere. In addition to following the above-described guidelines, employers must comply with Minnesota’s “Ban the Box” law, which restricts the timing of employer’s inquiries into an applicant’s criminal past. [See Minn. Stat. §§ 364.021, 364.06, 364.09]. Minnesota law requires employers to wait until a job applicant has been selected for an interview, or a conditional offer of employment has been extended, before inquiring about an applicant’s criminal history or conducting a criminal background check. Employee Privacy Considerations Where an employer provides employees with technology resources or monitors employees through its own technology, employees may argue that they have a right to privacy in the technology or conduct at issue. Privacy issues may also result from the online conduct of employees outside of the employer’s network or technology resources. Because of the public nature of the web and many social media sites, privacy law may, at first blush, seem inapplicable. However, the law regarding online privacy rights is unsettled, and some of the few cases involving the issue have raised the possibility of legal risks for employers, at least when online data comes from a website with privacy restriction settings. While privacy law is still unsettled and evolving, the following is a summary of some of the legal issues that might arise in the employment context. Common Law Invasion of Privacy. Minnesota recognizes invasion of an individual’s privacy as a tort action. See Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc. , 663 N.W.2d 550 (Minn. 2003). The most common privacy claims raised by employees against employers are intrusion upon seclusion and publication of private facts. To prove either type of

71

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker