This is an example of a previous winning summary statement:
XXX should win this award because they have made exceptional contribution to XXXX through:
● Improving service delivery to clients through the implementation of an HR solution which integrates with the payroll software and providing training to clients to ensure understanding; evidenced in the “improvements” section and appendices 1–4. ● Improving service delivery to non-HR clients through reviewing the data flow process and introducing new import routines which allows easy data upload; appendices 5 and 6. ● Increasing the annual payslip volume by in excess 18,000 payslips and increased revenue of circa £75K. ● Introducing reports of KPI (key performance indicators) and SLA (service level agreement) performance so that the team and clients measure their success; appendices 12–15. ● Managing the team development though skills gap analysis and the subsequent introduction of training sessions (appendices 9 and 10) as well as organising legislative training for the team to keep up to date with changes in the industry. ● Proving training in a cost effective manner through research resulting in cost savings for XXXX, whilst reducing the risk of financial penalties.
XXX is an advocate of CPD for himself, evidenced in appendix 22, and the team. He has introduced training evaluation documents, appendices 17 and 18, and 121s to ensure employee performance is measured, appendices 19-21. In addition, XXX is an advocate of the CIPP and the impact that the CIPP services can have on the payroll team and has arranged sessions to promote the CIPP and raise awareness of how the team can benefit through the support available.
Remember, whilst the summary statement has a word count of 250 words, the rest of the nomination does not. So you have plenty of space to let us know why you think you should win and provide evidence to back it up.
5. Finally, make sure that you get your nominations in on time so that they can be submitted for nomination on the judging day.
The judging process Judges are selected from various industry sectors based on their skills and knowledge within payroll and pensions. All judges are members of the CIPP so you are truly being recognised by your peers. The judging takes place during one day and the judges only review the information in-front of them in the nomination. They cannot and do not base any decision on personal opinion or prior knowledge of an individual or organisation.
We would like to thank our award sponsors
25
Issue 28 | March 2017
| Professional in Payroll, Pensions and Reward |
Made with FlippingBook HTML5