DeWitt Law Firm - February 2022

Brock vs. Brock

THE MAN WHO SUED HIMSELF

On July 1, 1993, Robert Lee Brock made a mistake. By his own account, he had a few too many alcoholic beverages that evening, and in his drunken state, he committed

since he was a ward of the state, he explained that Virginia should pay the $5 million on his behalf. After all, he was incarcerated and unable to work, and the state was responsible for his care. Plus, he promised to pay the money back after his release. In a move that shocked no one (except, perhaps, Brock), Judge Rebecca Beach Smith dismissed his case. While she did call his claim “ludicrous,” she also praised his creativity, stating that he “presented an innovative approach to civil rights litigation.” Perhaps the lawsuit against himself wasn’t his first or last attempt at legal restitution. He once filed 29 complaints in a single year. Due to the repeated suits, the court removed his ability to file further litigation. “None of Brock’s allegations have ever been found by any court to have any merit,” the decision read. “Because Brock’s repeated, frivolous claims have placed a significant burden on this court, as well as on the district court ... we hereby impose sanctions upon Brock.” Brock’s case ranked No. 3 on Time Magazine’s list of Top 10 Outrageous Legal Battles. So, while he didn’t achieve wealth, he did gain fame. It was an impressive feat for a man who found a novel way to take personal responsibility for his actions.

breaking and entering, as well as grand larceny. Brock was arrested, and the court sentenced him to 23 years behind bars at the Indian Creek Correctional Center in Chesapeake, Virginia. In 1995, Brock decided he deserved restitution. Reasoning that he had violated his own civil rights, he sued himself for $5 million. For his family’s pain and suffering, as well as his children’s college tuition, he requested $3 million. He also asked for $2 million to support his needs during his 23-year prison sentence. Central to Brock’s claim was that, due to his drinking, “I caused myself to violate my religious beliefs. This was done by my going out and getting arrested, which caused me to be in prison.” And

YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION THE DANGER OF TALC PRODUCTS

We are reviewing cases on behalf of women who developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after using talcum (talc) powder or other talc products. Since 1971, more than 20 studies have linked talcum powder to ovarian cancer. It has been alleged that Johnson & Johnson, the maker of popular talc-based products, knew about the risk of ovarian cancer since at least 1982, but they failed to warn women who used these products. In addition, recently unearthed information showed that Johnson & Johnson knew of the possible link of asbestos to their talc products. The first study to suggest that talc may cause ovarian cancer was published in 1971 in a medical journal, The Lancet. In the study, researchers discovered that a majority of ovarian tumors had talc particles “deeply embedded” in them. Then, in 1982,

researchers found that women using talcum powder during ovulation were 92% more likely to develop ovarian cancer. During the next three decades, an additional 21 studies were performed on talc powder, and almost all of these studies found that women using these products near their genitals were at an increased risk for developing ovarian cancer.

Thousands of people who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and

mesothelioma have filed lawsuits against companies that use talc in their products. Johnson & Johnson has been at the center of many recent lawsuits where victims claim they developed cancer after using the company’s talc-based items consistently for years. According to internal Johnson & Johnson documents, the company concealed this information from the public and refused to put safety warnings on its items or remove them from sales shelves. If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or ovarian cancer after using talc-based products, you may be eligible to file an individual lawsuit, especially if you have a consistent history of using such wares over a significant period of time. If you would like to discuss your options, please contact us today.

2 | WWW.DEWITTLAW.COM • 407-245-7723

Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator