King's Business - 1916-05

414

THE KING’S BUSINESS

known to men, who can give them ordi­ nances and rites o f worship, and reward or punish them as they obey or disobey. I f there be not such a God, making known His truth to those whom He chooses, and inspiring them to teach others, the Bible is a record o f what could not possibly have taken place. Its Jehovah is a being who does not exist, and all its accounts o f His dealings with men are idle fictions. QUIZZING TH E CR IT IC - When, therefore, a critic sits in judg­ ment on the Bible, we ask him, first of all, what he believes respecting God and His relations to men. Can these relations, as presented in it, be true? I f his con­ ception o f God be such that he starts with the assumption o f the necessary, untruth­ fulness o f most important points o f the biblical record, it is idle to consider his criticism in detail; if, indeed, that can be called criticism which assumes the neces­ sary falsity o f the statements criticised. Foot noté— (In Jewish history, as pre­ sented by the pantheistic .critics, we have not the dealings of God with the Jews, but the evolution o f their conception of God. T h e.historical statements have value chiefly as illustrative of the growth o f spiritual ideas. God is not a Person mak­ ing known to them in gradual revelation a purpose in which He calls them the workers'together with Him, but an imper­ sonal spiritual Principle developing itself in them. It is on thi^ ground that such histories of the Jews as given by Kuenen, Reuss, Renan, f, Menzies, and others, although they may have value for the criti­ cal student, tend to weaken the faith o f the general reader in the Biblical history. If this does not conform to the historian’s philosophy o f God and o f man’s religious^ development, the conclusion is foregone that the events could not have taken place as narrated). W e may then exclude from the class of true biblical critics all thoSe who, denying a personal God, make thereby the funda­ mental statements o f the Scriptures, dog­ matic and historical, impossible. And the

agnostic must also be excluded, since his affirmation o f the unknowability o f God is, in substance, a positive assertion that the Bible, as a revelation o f His character and will, cannot be true. O f its essential falsity ' to the atheist, it is not necessary to speak. The critics o f these several classes are thus set free from any inquiry as to the reality o f the great facts on which biblical history rests—the creation, the relation o f Adam to the race, the fall,, the redemption, the Incarnation. Its found­ ation truths denied in advance, the Bible ceases to be a sacred and authoritative book, and has' an interest for the critic only as the sacred books o f other peoples have, that he may show its origin, its grad­ ual growth, how its statements came to be believed, and what influence they have had in moulding modern religious belief. Its study ,is mainly a matter o f antiquarian research, and its chief value is as an illus­ tration o f one conspicuous form o f relig­ ious development. W H Y SO PERSISTENT ?' It may seem strange that pantheists, agnostics, and atheists should think it worth while to employ themselves upon such a work o f supererogation as to attack the Bible in detail, when they have already condemned it in the gross; but many books o f this kind o f pseudo-criticism are .yearly written. W e may take as an eminent example Strauss in his “Life o f Jesus.” With his pantheistic conception o f God and o f His relations to men, he could not accept the Gospels as possibly true. Such a man as the Incarnate Son, the Christ of the Church, could never have lived. Undoubtedly there lived the man Jesus, a super-eminent religious genius, ^yet in nature a man like other men, without super­ natural powers, a son o f His age; and the work of criticism is to separate the nucleus o f historical truth in the gospel narratives from the encrustations that have grown up around it. The reader, knowing his philosophical starting point, knows from the first ^to what conclusion Strauss will come; and that, even if there were abso-

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker