Real Estate Journal — October 30 - November 12, 2015 — 3A


M id A tlantic

M id A tlantic R eal E state J ournal By Pamela A. Michaels, Esq., Asset Preservation What to do about expenses ina §1031Exchange? P art 1 In order to obtain com- plete deferral of capital

Have a great story but don’t have the time to put the words down on paper? We’ve got you covered!

gain. Thus, a careful review of the closing statements on the relinquished property sale and the replacement property pur- chase before closing is strongly recommended. Often an item that would generate boot can be dealt with in a way that will avoid characterization as boot. Part 2 of this Article to Appear in the Next Edition of the Mid Atlantic Real Estate Journal Pamela Michaels is an attorney and VP of Asset Preservation, Inc. and can be reached at 866-317-1031 or at pmichaels@apiex- change.com. n

§1.468B-6(b) states that trans- actional expenses are “the usual and customary ex- penses paid or incurred in connection with a deferred exchange. For example, the costs of land surveys, appraisals, title examina- tions, termite inspections, transfer taxes, and record- ing fees are transactional expenses.” While the payment of transactional expenses out of proceeds will not disqualify an exchange, payment of such items out of exchange proceeds may generate boot resulting in the recognition of some taxable

For more information about 1031 exchanges, visit www.api- exchange.com. As a "Qualified Intermediary" as defined in the Section 1031 regulations, Asset Preservation, Inc. is not able to provide legal or tax advice. Ac- cordingly, you should review the details of your specific transac-

gain taxes in an exchange o t h e r w i s e meeting the requirements o f Internal R e v e n u e Code §1031, a taxpayer is generally re-

Pamela Michaels

Contact Alissa Aronson, PR Writer/Publisher, MAREJ Email: aaronson@marejournal.com Phone: 781.871.5298 x211

quired to reinvest all net sale proceeds generated by the sale of relinquished property in like-kind replacement property within the applicable exchange period (a maximum 180 cal- endar days). In addition, the taxpayer must not have a direct or indirect right to receive or otherwise obtain the benefit of the exchange proceeds during the exchange period except to acquire like-kind replacement property. Any non like-kind property received by the tax- payer in the exchange, usually referred to as boot, will cause the taxpayer to recognize gain. Under the foregoing rules, the use of exchange funds to pay expenses not related to the exchange could invalidate the exchange to the extent such use results in the taxpayer’s constructive receipt of exchange proceeds. In other cases, pay- ment of an expense related to the disposition of relinquished property or acquisition of re- placement property may give rise to taxable boot in the ex- change but would not create a constructive receipt problem. Finally, payment of certain costs related to the transfer of the relinquished property that may be characterized as selling expenses or exchange expenses are excluded from the seller’s amount realized and ignored altogether. T r e a s u r y R e g u l a t i o n §1.1031(k)-1(g)(7) permits cer- tain transactional expenses related to the exchange trans- action to be paid from exchange proceeds without disqualifying the exchange. These include items that relate to the dis- position of the relinquished property or to the acquisition of the replacement property and appear under local stan- dards in the typical closing statements as the responsibil- ity of a buyer or seller (e.g., commissions, prorated taxes, recording or transfer taxes, and title company fees). See also Letter Ruling 8328011. Similarly, proposed regulation

Exchange Smart. Security you can bank on

Pamela Michaels, Esq. Vice President / Division Manager Manhattan: 866.317.1031 | Long Island: 866.394.1031 pmichaels@apiexchange.com | apiexchange.com Call for a complimentary consultation.

A National IRC §1031 “Qualified Intermediary”

Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker