EVIDENCE-BASED REGULATION
The domino effect of gambling regulation
JURISDICTIONS REPLICATING REGULATIONS FROM OTHER COUNTRIES FAIL PROBLEM GAMBLERS AND LET DOWN THE INDUSTRY, SAYS MARTA DE FRANCISCO
T his article explores the global trend where jurisdictions replicate measures initiated by other countries when it comes to the regulation of gambling, particularly when it comes to advertising and responsible gaming restrictions. We examine cases from Italy to Colombia, Spain, the UK, Ecuador, and Peru, shedding light on instances of regulatory emulation and its potential consequences. Emphasizing the need for nuanced, evidence-based approaches, the conclusion stresses the importance of recalibrating regulatory strategies. It calls for a flexible and inclusive framework grounded in data- driven policies and tailored to individual country needs to foster responsible gaming, innovation, and industry growth. The article underscores the risks of over-legislation and the need to consider the unique dynamics and challenges of each jurisdiction before imposing standardized regulations.
Background Since the implementation of the Dignity Decree (Decreto Dignità) in Italy in mid-2018, introducing a ban on gambling advertising, numerous countries have followed suit, sparking a domino effect. Italy, it seems, set a trend and the imposition of marketing restrictions has transcended European borders, resonating globally. This article explores the contrasting approaches taken by the different nations, shedding light on the need for meticulous evaluation of data before implementing restrictions. The common thread behind the adoption of such stringent measures is the goal to combat gambling addiction or pathological gambling within society. However, this article aims to question whether the measures adopted are
PAGE 54
IMGL MAGAZINE | JANUARY 2024
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker