VII One Sunday, Clare and I visited Baron Hill Estate, then old Bulkeley mansion. Built as a family house and a guesthouse for King George IV, it fell into disuse during the First World War. By the time the Second World War broke out, only one of the Bulkeleys was still living in the vast property. It was then used to house Polish refugees before a fire gutted it. Post-war, the resurgent Bulkeley family wanted to rebuild the premises, but – sweet irony – they have been blocked; there is a protected species of bat that nests in the ruins, whose habitat would be threatened by renovations, and so it is the bat that is sovereign and the ruin that is conserved. The site of the mansion would make for a perfect children’s play area; ruins of meaning, ready to be brought to life by active young minds. Abandoned guests from other continents hide in the garden: palm trees and jasmine flowers – foreigners to these lands – clearly brought here to be part of an arboretum, but now overrun by gorse and blackberry. The walls hold holiday dreams suspended in mid- air: fireplaces open onto nothing, and below them trees emerge out of the sides of what were once four-poster beds. At the edge of the manor lies the rusted skeleton of a greenhouse. Its curved metal ribs now jostle with tree trunks whose limbs follow the path of their metal forbearers. When should we stop the process of decay? The house was already ruined before the fire. If I had seen it in 1917, with just one ageing Bulkeley and a skeleton staff, wouldn’t I have said that this is the ruin of the British upper class – little did I know – and that it should be preserved? These questions bring me back to Lévi-Strauss’s Tristes Tropiques . The anthropologist is wandering disconsolately around the concrete bungalows of the suburbs of Lahore, looking in vain for the real Lahore: the mythical place of which he dreams. It is a classically modernist trope: the past worlds are gone, and our dull concrete constructions have replaced myth with utility. He is sceptical of his own melancholy. He writes: ‘I lose on both counts, and more seriously than may at first appear, for, while I complain of being able to glimpse no more than the shadow of the past, I may be insensitive to reality as it is taking shape at this very moment, since I have not reached the stage of development at which I would be capable of perceiving it. A few hundred years hence, in this same place, another traveller, as despairing as myself, will mourn the disappearance of what I might have seen, but failed to see.’
For Clare, putting on the exhibit was partly a way of trying – as saving them was not possible – to redeem the destruction of the sheds. The sanctification of past objects, I thought, doesn’t seem like an adequate path to salvation. The sheds were a community. The same men sat there, day in day out, talking about boats. They worked with love, spending hours repainting a boat before heading home for the night: it was a practice that grounded them – a relationship to material objects that is not about conservation or heritage, but the active transformation of the world they inhabited. Clare’s practice, in some ways, is analogous to the boat-builders. They were moored in the world through the lathe. After they had finished work, Clare would prowl around Gallows Point, finding objects, taking them home, turning them into sculptures.
right: The last shed to be demolished at Gallows Point The once-social life of the sheds, Gallows Point community
54
Clare Calder-Marshall
photographer unknown
Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator