Quality criterion
Indicators
5.1. All those involved in the project are committed to developing an inclusive culture (mindset).
The partner organisations and the leadership team have reflected on their role and self-perception as experts and/or team leaders.
All those involved in the project have agreed on a definition of in- clusion and related terms and concepts such as diversity, ableism, racism, discrimination and privilege ( → see annex) .
All those involved in the project have agreed to adopt a pro-in- clusion mindset.
Quality criterion
Indicators
5.2. The partner organisations ensure that the barriers to access to the project are low.
Underrepresented target groups are deliberately invited to par- ticipate. They are provided with active support both before and during the project. Potential barriers to access have been mini- mised. During planning, participants are asked to communicate their needs which are then taken into consideration, e.g., dietary re- quirements, accessibility, support needs, structure of the day, breaks, and spaces to retreat ( → see annex) . The potential of digital exchanges is deliberately leveraged in order to gradually familiarise young people who have mobility challenges with exchange projects.
INCLUSIVE, PARTICIPATORY DESIGN — 27
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs