04:05 EMEA
narrative and no credible explanation for how they’d gone unaddressed. The reputational damage was immediate and, for some, lasting. The EU Directive will require the same kind of disclosure across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously. If you haven’t already identified and started addressing your gaps by the time reporting becomes mandatory, you’ll be publishing a problem you haven’t yet solved. That’s the position organisations find themselves in when they wait for regulation to force the question, rather than using the data they already hold to answer it now. The Gap You Can’t See Pay gaps don’t announce themselves. They accumulate quietly through inconsistent starting salaries, uneven bonus allocation, promotion patterns that favour certain demographics and legacy structures that haven’t been revisited in years. By the time they surface in a mandatory disclosure, the damage to trust and retention is already done. The data to identify these gaps exists within your payroll and HRIS systems today. The challenge, for most multinational organisations,
Household-name employers found themselves in headlines they couldn’t
control. Gaps of 30%, 40%, and even 50%
were published with no accompanying narrative and no credible explanation for how they’d gone unaddressed.
The organisations best placed to respond are those already leveraging their payroll data as a strategic asset, not those rapidly assembling it under regulatory pressure. We’ve Seen What Happens When Organisations Aren’t Ready When the first UK gender pay gap reporting was published in 2018, the results were stark. Household-name employers found themselves in headlines they couldn’t control. Gaps of 30%, 40%, and even 50% were published with no accompanying
34 I 04:05
GLOBAL PAYROLL MAGAZINE ISSUE 24
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online