226 The Fundamentals dered. Criticism must accomplish its task, and every lover of truth is more than willing that it should do so. Reluctance l t i o sh s e e d e , t i r n u a th ny fu d l e ly pa i r n tm ve e s n ti t g o at f ed th , o f u u g ll h y t a a s n c d er i t n a q in u e ir d y, an an d d es m ta o b st of all in those departments which are highest, is lamentable evidence of moral weakness, of imperfect confidence in Him who is the God of truth. But criticism must proceed by legitimate methods and in a true spirit. It must steadfastly keep before it all the facts essential to be taken into account. In the case of its application to the Bible and re�on, it is most reasonable to demand that full weight should be allowed to all the teachings, all the words of Him who only knows the Father, and who came to reveal Him to the world, and who is Himself the Truth. If all Scripture bears testimony to Christ, we cannot refuse to hear Him when He speaks of c it i s de ch d a iff ra e c r t e e n r t is ly tic f s r . om It th is e f L o o ll r y d , a it ny is q u u n e u s t t t io e n ra r b e l g e a i r m d p in ie g t t y h , e to Bi d b e le on which we have His verdict; nor does it improve the case to say that we shall listen to Him when He speaks of spiritual truth, but shall count ourselves free when the question is one of scholarship. Alas for our scholarship when it brings us into controversy with Him who is the Prophet, as He is the Priest and King of the Church, and by whose Spirit both Prophets and Apostles spake I Nothing has been said in thi.:; paper respecting the proper method of interpreting the different books and parts of the Old Testament, nor the way of dealing with specific difficulties. Our object has been to show that the Lord regards the entire book, or collection of books, as divine, authoritative, infallible. But in the wide variety 0£,.these writings there are many forms of composition, and every part, it is obvious to say, must be understood and explained in accordance with the rules of interpretation which apply to literature of its kind. We have not been trying in advance to bind up the interpreter to an unintelligent literalism in exegesis, which
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker