6. the written justification statement supporting the selection, except for those portions that are to be non-disclosed as provided for above under “Submission of confidential information”. The following information will not be disclosed by the District at any time to the public including under any GRAMA request: 1. the names of individual scorers/evaluators in relation to their individual scores or rankings; 2. any individual scorer's/evaluator's notes, drafts, and working documents; 3. non-public financial statements; and 4. past performance and reference information, which is not provided by the offeror and which is obtained as a result of the efforts of the District. However, to the extent such past performance or reference information is included in the written justification statement, it is subject to public disclosure. Utah Admin. Rules R33-7-802 (July 26, 2018)
1.1013.05 MULTIPLE STAGE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Issue date: 5/8/14 Updated: 3/12/20 CBD
The District may conduct a request for proposals in stages, where an earlier stage is used to qualify offerors for subsequent stages or to narrow the number of offerors that will move on to subsequent stages. A multiple-stage request for proposals shall be conducted according to this policy. Utah Code § 63G-6a-710 (2013) 1.1013.06 MULTIPLE STAGE COST QUALIFICATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROCESS Issue date: 12/13/18 Updated: 3/12/20 CBD The Procurement Policy Board allows the District to use a multiple stage cost qualification request for proposals process. This is appropriate for use when the District does not want to spend time evaluating the technical responses of proposals with cost estimates that exceed the stated budget or significantly exceed the lowest cost proposal. A multiple stage cost qualification request for proposals process shall be conducted as follows. Definitions For purposes of this process, the following definitions will apply: “Multiple stage cost qualification RFP process” means a multiple stage RFP process in which cost proposals are evaluated prior to the evaluation of technical criteria and are used to reject offerors based on established cost criteria. “Maximum cost differential percentage threshold” is a cost ceiling that is established by the District that an offeror’s cost proposal must not exceed or the offeror’s proposal will be rejected and the offeror will not be allowed to proceed to a subsequent stage. The maximum cost differential percentage threshold may be based on the lowest cost proposal submitted, or the District’s stated budget, or a combination of those two. For example:
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker