or evidence based pracDce discussion the default is to the literature and we need those other two components out that are equally important. In this discussion I don't know that the paDent perspecDve is as powerful as it is in other decisions. The pracDDoner needs to decide whether or not they're going to thrust into that paDent. If the paDent says, "Oh go ahead Doc give it a try." I'm okay with that, that is no release of liability, that's no way in the world to pracDce. That doesn't really modify anything. But the experience of the pracDDoner does. Bryan made reference to a couple indicaDons that were obviously things that you would never know about unDl you had that x-ray. Those are the things that you and I are concerned about. The other part of this discussion is that x-ray gets lumped into the broader category of advanced imaging. Reference is always made to the expense of advanced imaging, the complicaDons that arise from advanced imaging, the tendency to have more people move towards surgery with advanced imaging because the more imaging you show the more findings you're going to have and you get into mulDple MRI's, mulDple CT's, they're going to find stuff. You're always going to find stuff, whether or not it's meaningful in the long run to the paDent's another quesDon, and whether or not that takes somebody in another direcDon. When we narrow this discussion down to just x-ray, and just plain film x-ray in this environment we need to be realisDc and say that the amount of radiaDon that that's involving is preSy minimal. The amount of expense that that's involving is preSy minimal. Now we need to come back to this and say what's the value to the pracDDoner and ulDmately to the paDent to have that image in that se^ng. That's where all of this hinges. I personally think that we have taken the experiences of other disciplines and their guidelines and aSempted to shoehorn them to our situaDon. As Doctor Goertz readily admits in the absence of informaDon for or against relaDve to any technique approach or chiropracDc adjusDng in general, and make decisions as we move forward from that standpoint about what should and shouldn't be done by pracDDoners. The experience of the pracDDoner in these situaDons is criDcal. I'm not in favor of everybody gets an x- ray just because they showed up in a chiropractor's office that day, and so on. If the history, the physical and the presentaDon of the paDent is an indicator that there should be, if the judgment of the pracDDoner based upon the presentaDon of the paDent, the history and physical, it begins to have those arm bells go off in their head. I don't see the reason not to x-ray at that point. The generalized you get an x-ray because you showed up, no I'm not in favor of that. But when there's a clinical indicaDon, whether it arises to the level of being a red flag to suggest cancer or to suggest fracture zone, it is an obvious factor. But when it doesn't rise to that level there can sDll be plenty of indicaDon and plenty of uDlity for a pracDDoner to learn something from that image, protect the paDent, and protect themselves in the process, but primarily protect the paDent. I think it's very important for us to take a broader lens look at the evidence informed decision making model that we're looking at relaDve to this and to learn from the perspecDve that Doctor Goertz put forward that you don't have
Chiropractor Malpractice Insurance - ACA X-ray Guideline 3 Drs. Clum, ...
Page ! of ! 8 11
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker