WALKER BOOTS Using Walkers Effectively?
INDICATIONS Due to the difference in technology and indication between pneumatic and basic walker boots, there is naturally a cost variance.
We understand managing your budget is important, therefore ensuring the correct boot is used for the appropriate indication is a key consideration. For example, using pneumatic walkers for a low level ankle sprain is likely not necessary. This is not a cost effective solution, and a basic walker is better suited. In comparison, more serious indications such as a grade 3 ankle sprain or fracture where the patient needs longer term immobilisation may be more effectively managed in a pneumatic walker₃.
Based on the usage of multiple large hospitals in the UK, we have provided the following data to help you determine how your service compares.
39%
AVERAGE WALKER BOOT SPLIT: NHS The 40/60 split is a common trend across hospital sites and is a good indicator of the volume split expected in the NHS. The below chart includes an outlier (Hospital B) compared to the general average. This suggests patients may be being inappropriately fitted in a basic walker. This may lead to poorer outcomes, multiple return visits to clinic, and if using for a prolonged period – multiple boots per patient. Ultimately, a less cost-effective option, even if the initial cost of the basic walker is less.
61%
PNEUMATIC WALKER
BASIC WALKER
WALKER BOOT BREAKDOWN BY HOSPITAL
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
00
HOSPITAL A
HOSPITAL B
HOSPITAL C
HOSPITAL D
PNEUMATIC WALKER
BASIC WALKER
[ 6 ]
Made with FlippingBook - PDF hosting